Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/42333/2022 of M MADHAVI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.42333 OF 2022 Between:- Smt. M.Madhavi, W/o.Sankarachari … Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

WRIT PETITION No.42333 OF 2022

Between:-

Smt. M.Madhavi, W/o.Sankarachari

and

… Petitioner

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, and others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : M/s.Srinivasulu Kurra Counsel for R.1 to R.4

: The G.P. for Revenue

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.

2. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition, in short, is that despite making application in Form 6-A on 30.10.2021 seeking mutation of the petitioner’s name in the Revenue records by updating the name of the petitioner in Online Web Portal and issue Pattadar Pass Books and Title Deeds (PPBs/TDs) in respect of the land in an extent of Ac.3.90 cents in survey No.23/P22 situated at Nachaneri Village, Yerpedu Mandal, Tirupati District, no steps have been taken by the respondents so far.

3. As the application of the petitioner is required to be considered by the 4[th] respondent, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, is inclined to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 4[th] respondent to take necessary action on the petitioner’s recent application dated 30.10.2021 strictly in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if the same has not already been considered so far.

4. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

________________________

NINALA JAYASURYA, J December 30, 2022. ANI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead