WRIT PETITION 18624 of 2002 on 12 August 2002

1. Y.KOTESWARA RAO, S/O FLAT NO. 10. KAKATIYA MANSION, 5TH LINE B.V. GARDEN, GUNTURLINE B.V. GARDEN, GUNTUR

...PETITIONER

AND

1. CHAIRMAN MD FACT LTD KERALA, FACT LIMITED, UDYOGAMANDAL, KERALA-683 501UDYOGAMANDAL, KERALA-683 501

2. THE ENQUIRY OFFICER AND MANAGER, DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRIES FACT LTD., UDYOGAMANDAL, KERALA-683 501ENQUIRIES FACT LTD., UDYOGAMANDAL, KERALA-683 501

3. THE ENQUIRY OFFICER AND MANAGER, DEPARITENTAL ENQUIRIES, FACT LTD., UDYOGAMANDAL, KERALA- 683 501ENQUIRIES, FACT LTD., UDYOGAMANDAL, KERALA- 683 501

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more so a writ in the nature of Certiorari thereby calling for the records from the 1st respondent company and quash the impugned proceedings No.GM[P]CO-PER-363 DATED:12.8.2002 passed by the 1st respondent and proceedings No. MD-CO-S-004/02 dated 26.3.2002 passed by the 2nd respondent by declaring them as illegal, unlawful, capricious and opposed to the principles of natural justice and may pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.

IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 23418 OF 2002

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the above Writ Petition and may pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. G VASANTHA RAYUDU

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. S RAVINDRANATH

2. G RAMACHANDRA RAO

The Court made the following order:

Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 28.08.2025, 24.07.2025 and 07.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case.

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed.

Date: 25.09.2025

MP

___________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

165

MP

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO:18624 of 2002

Date: 25.09.2025