Chhattisgarh High Court

WP/2323/2001 of KU. RITA SINGH Vs STATE ADMIS. TRIBUNAL RAIPUR AND ORS. on 7 December 2001

Cites 0, Cited by 0

&? OHH&S'IIS&ABB ; A ® SEIASSTIB. TOIT PEa'S0H TO.23?9/2001. SBEEaTCNER ..*' -•••''n^ ^ ,..--?^ .<\^-.^'' ..^-^^;..-^ "^v' <^'.^" .-' ?•• ..'^ . ' ^<-' BESPO'KDEm'S I. Rita Singh, S/o I&te Sliaslu.ram, aged a'bou't 52 years,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

T^'r33B'WfSf'SES HT&H&? OHH&S'IIS&ABB ;A® SEIASSTIB.?vG'^TOITPEa'S0H TO.23?9/2001.SBEEaTCNERI. Rita Singh,S/o I&te Sliaslu.ram,aged a'bou't 52 years, Worteiiag as..*'Assistan'li i'eaoher in Vbs Soyli. Girl^-•••''n^^ ,..--?^Sohool,Baigarh,S/o Badhuvan %ra,.<\^-.^''teigarh (0.®.)...^-^ "^v'<^'.^"^;..-^ .-''- Versus ~?•• ..'^.^<-'oBESPO'KDEm'S1.^'Ehe State Adninis'tra'tsiye 'Ertbunal,Benoh Ai Baipur, Baipur (C.S. ).2. State ef CIiha-Stisgarh,Biroughs She Seore'feary, Bepartaentof SchoolEdaoa-);ion, B.K. Buu.lding,Baipur (0.6.).'Sa.e3. OoBBaiLssioner, Bilaspur,Bilaspur Mvision (0.5. ).4. Mstrie'S Eduoa-Sion Officer, Baigarh,Msti;. Ba3.ga.ph (G.&.).VS3.T 'PS'Ei'SIWWS5SR AE'I'IOIiES 226/227 VS TBS GCSS'S'IS'VSS.e'BerIHHTA

'3^'^iraRPt, ^TltWTS, fsldlti^i

»:I-HC-22

^^ 'ttww<i, vs-Awsvc, hwwy.

'"w.

U, P. Ul'.l-'^'l.'^/Dl'"w.

b^

311^1^1s^fsfi^r ^tciiw: ^iftiicbf<iw4i-i ^l+ifff ^ Fs^i <^I^Ki? STpgi; 3ii^ig?=i ,'gre(Tfe'decisionFeelingaggrievedbytheontheir-srepresentationssom.et}ffhem.approachedtheStateAdmlnistrativeTribiinalbyfUingOrigtnalAppUcations.Learned State Administ|rative Tribunal passed individualorders in each of the petiljion. Against the order passed by theState Administrative Trjibunal fhe petitioners havefiledpetitions before fhis Cour)t.The matter relates t|3 policy of rationalization of transferand posting of teachers^f Prunary and Middle Schools. Theeducation session is goijng on. The order of transfer andposting by which souie oflthe pej-sons/teachers are aggrievedis of the nionfh ofJulv2Q010.. Froin that tirae the teachers arelitigatlng in Courts, Che e|ducation of ttie students is affectingtn absence of teachers. 1 Dr ShuMa submits 'that in someschools there is no teachbr and in sorue schools there is onlv^i^one teacherfhence no te^ching is betng carried on and fhe<&'

[1^^KS*i

'3'^ -iiwwf, »Tfll'y<i6, facii+fy'

T"I 'fww'i, anlyis, fticii'Hy

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead