Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/20898/2019 of Maddu Srinivasa Rao, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 December 2019
SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION NO.20898 OF 2019 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner represented that no cause survives, as the petitioner was arrested, after filing writ petition, recording his confession. Therefore,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION NO.20898 OF 2019
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner represented that no cause survives, as the petitioner was arrested, after filing writ petition, recording his confession. Therefore, the writ petition became infructuous.
In view of the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
____________________________________________
JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Dated 31.12.2019 Rvk