Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/690/2001 of R.D.SHARMA Vs M.P.S.R.T.C. and ORS. on 10 December 2001
COURT OF JUDICATUgE AT_BJLASPUR(CI‘H~IAZITISGARH) i w.P. N0. G90 /2001 EETiTlGm R.Di Sharma,‘ S/o.Late Shri V.‘P"; Shanna Aged 59 years; Retired Head Clerk; M.P. S. R. 'I‘. Corporation; Divisional Worksholo, Raipur: (C.G.) Resicient of Vaishali Nagar,: Bilaspur
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
lNTHE HIGHCOURTOF JUDICATUgEAT_BJLASPUR(CI‘H~IAZITISGARH)iw.P.N0.G90/2001EETiTlGmR.DiSharma,‘S/o.LateShriV.‘P";Shanna,Aged59years;Retired Head Clerk;M.P. S. R.['I‘.]Corporation;DivisionalWorksholo,Raipur:(C.G.)Resicientof VaishaliNagar,:Bilaspur(c.G.)Vs .tRESPONDENTS.‘M. P. S.R.T.CorporationyHeadOfficeg‘i,fcoURTT:Habibganj r\IBH‘\Bhopal(Mm)Throughits[Managing][ DireCtOr]Divisi OnalManagerf;M. P. S.R.T.Corp oratian,DivisiOnai0££ice,;Raipur(c.[G.)]WRITPETITION UNDER ARTIGaE226OF THECONSTITUTIONOFINDIA’ EURESSUANCEOE WRITIN THE1%TURE OFCERTIORARI,MANMUS,DAPEQHEITION[AND][ FOR]SUITABLE WRITOR WRITS, ‘
10/12/2001-
Pefl‘honer by Shrl Ashish Shrivasfava, Advocate.Respondenf by Shrl[‘Dhir‘endmLMishm,]Advocm'e.
Heard.
Theinisrefir'ed from Service. peTi'rioner pe‘ri‘rion hdsHeisye1'1'0receivehisre‘hrbenefits.Due1’0nonreceipfof\dre'hmlbeneflfs Thepe'rrhonerhis dependan‘is arefacinggreaffinancual[hardship]A prayer habeen made['l'haf]paymenf[of][ reflral]benefifscannoi'bedelayedI asmuchasITIsfherighfofThe1’0recelve suchbeneIfsI? has been sfa‘reda‘r The BarpefmonerTimeandagainfha'rIfIsnoounfyandn‘Isfhedu'ryoffhecompe‘l’enf aufhorrl'y[‘ro]hlbeneflfsOne and['l-he]only reasonpay[re']every hme Thai Is fhis Cour‘l’ Is fha'i' the deparfmen‘r[ is,] placed beforefacmg % financial crunch.
‘ ShriDhirendraMihra,learnedcounselappearingfor'l'o'rheTheDeparfmenfdrawsmyenfioni‘documenf’ dafed29/08/2001 whichis said fo bescheme which has been evolved by‘I'hedeparfmen‘l’ for fhe purpoof paymenf ofreTiralbenefi'rs1’0The employees who has since re iredThe scheme proposes fo makeofRs.5,000/—foThemployeesofGrade-IandII andpaymenfRs.3,000/- To The employees ofrude-III and IV per monTh.
Ii
[ms[am]
m'm (War)
WW1%WWmmamfvsaaawmIf has been‘ .onfended by The counsel represenhna ThePefmoner fhaf[‘rhe]pefmdner[should][ be]paid[a‘r][ leasf][ To][ begun][ wrrh][ a]reasonable iump sum.Afferglvmgmyanxiouséonsidemfionfor fhevarioussubmusslons made on behaIf of[‘rhe]I am of[‘l'he]opinion Tha‘rpnrfiessince sooner- or laTer The respondenT musT is duero Trei pay whaTeverreTiredemployeeandalsi3TakingmToconsideraTionThehardshipscausedToThe employeenThe absenceof anyr'eTiraI paymenT ofbenefrfs To him afTer heas reTired from servuceiT Will be JusTfairand reasonable To direcThe respondenT To sum pay The peTlTioner' aof Rs 25 000/- wuThin TwmonThs from The daTe of receipT of ThisorderThereafTerIdil‘ecTThaTTherespondenTsshallmakepaymenT[sTmcTly][ In][ accord][ ince WITh][ The][ scheme][ ThaT][ has][ been]placedbeforeThls CourT unTilTlielasT paisaIsWhaTever amounTlhas been paIdAWaccordance WiTh Thedil~ecTion of Thls CourTshall be adJusTedWiThTheabovedirecTionsandobservaTions,ThispeTiTionis disposed ofOnfailureTopay[The]money as direcTedabove WiThmThesTipulaTe'd Tlme TheshallsTand enTITled peTmonerTo The InTeresT aT The raTe of 18% paymenT of per annumLeTThecom )llancereporTbesubmiTTedbeforeThisRegisTry.CerTified copy of This order be supplied as per rules.Sdl-,ll’GRPRJLFSG 1 150:300.lI:Chief Justicel