WP/2438/2001 of SAFIQUE AHMED Vs THE STATE OF C.G.TH.DEPTT.OF HEALTH DEP on 13 December 2001

amoucoauannqgaonoa

Writ Petitian

293?No./200[1]

Sauefiq Am,hed

S/a

e.

aoutb

aegd

yars

"1‘

R/oTeba Chouk{alapara.

‘

g.

Bilasur

i

StateofChhattisgarh

Throug:hDepartment>5ecretaryiofI‘nHeLatth[‘$éfvices,],Health’ Department,Dy.,K.Bhafvian."

Bapal.p

2. CivilSurgeon cum CiehfMedical-[O][f][icer.]

SardarPatel Chikitsalaya.

"

Bilaspur.3[.][ Collector][ ,]Bilaspur.WRITPETITION .Ul‘DERARTICLE226(227OF;THECONSTITUTION[OF]INDIA[FOR][ issUANcE]OFAWRIT OFMAWAMUS:[‘CERTIORARI‘]PROHIBITIONANDIORANY OmSUITAB’IEWRiTiORDERORIgacfxong[To][ no][ UUSTICE][ .]r m m aWW<W)

am: mWW§f§€rfW‘mwmmm$WwmWW‘rha‘rShriJaiswalsubmits fhiskind of anac‘r of fheS1'a1'esurely aTfracfs The app[‘ica'rion]of exercise of This power ofCour? underAr'l'icle 226of1+eConsfi‘ru‘rion of India.As againsf‘l'ha‘rthisShriGau'mmBhqdurir sub['nH's]*hemufferrekrfesLm‘a¢con'rmcf.Theremedysough‘l’forinfhispe‘ri‘rionisasregardsrefundoffheearnestmonevandalsofhesecuri‘tyamounfdeposifed by[‘rhe]wri‘r peTiTioner- for me purpose oftsecuring somework by submi‘r‘ring fender papers. I'r is sfa‘red by Shri Bhaduri i'i'haffhe‘ remedyclearlyliesbeforeacompei'eni'civilCourf andnoTbefore This Cour‘i'.On perusal of[‘rhe]vermen‘rs of fhis pefi'rion and offerhearingcounselappearing for01h 1he sides, I am of‘ihe opinionTho'r1hema‘rfera1'issuehasarisenoutofapureandsimpleconfracf work. The remedy sou hf foris also/as regards refund ofearnesf money andsecuri‘ryauni“. Insuch asi‘iuoi'ion I‘r‘rn nofinclined Toholdfhaffhewripe‘ri‘rionerisentifledfohavearemedy fromThis Courfin exe cise of exfra ordinary jurisdicfiounderArficle 226of fhe Consi‘l'ufionm of India. In my view, Theremedy lies beforea compefenfu'rhori'fyIn The resul'r fhisfi'rion is rejec'red. pCerfified copy asr rules. p7sd]-J"itxchief[Jusu'ce]