Gujarat High Court
AO/312/1992 of NAGJIBHAI R VEKARIA Vs TAPUBHAI D CHHAYANI on 18 December 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No 312 of 1992 with CIVIL APPLICATION No 2321 of 1992 with CIVIL APPLICATION No 2640 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
APPEAL FROM ORDER No 312 of 1992
with
CIVIL APPLICATION No 2321 of 1992
with
CIVIL APPLICATION No 2640 of 1992
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- NAGJIBHAI R VEKARIAVersus TAPUBHAI D CHHAYANI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR YOGESH S LAKHANI for Appellants/Applicants MR SURESH M SHAH for Respondent/Opponents No.1, 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 18/12/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. As a result of the hearing and discussion, a consensus has been arrived at between the learned counsel (A) The trial court shall hear and dispose off the pending suit namely Special Civil Suit No. 220
of 1990 as expeditiously as possible and in any case not later than 30th June, 1999.
(B) It is clarified and directed that until the said suit is disposed off, the interim orders passed by this Court in C.A. No. 2321 of 1992 shall continue to operate.
3. In view of the aforesaid directions, learned counsel for the appellant does not press this appeal for any further relief and the same is accordingly disposed off.
4. Civil Application No. 2640 of 1992 is for the purpose of bringing additional evidence on record of the present appeal. Since the appeal has been disposed off bythe present order, this application does not survive and is accordingly disposed off.
5. Civil Application No. 2321 of 1992 has already been disposed off and therefore does not require any further orders.
5. The Registry is directed to send yadi to the trial court forthwith i.e. not later than 23rd December, 1998. Direct service is also permitted.
********
pirzada/-