Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/712/2020 of VEERAGANDHAM SATYANARAYANA Vs ALLU VENKATA BHARATHI LAKSHMI on 31 December 2024
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV/’ TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBEf(^^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 712 OF 2020 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV/’
TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBEf(^^TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR<
<
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 712 OF 2020
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that inthe circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may bepleased to set aside the order dt 24.12.2019in I.A.No.1267of 2019inO.S.No.9of 2015inthecourtoftheXIIIAdditionalDistrictJudge,Narsaraopet, GunturDistrict.
BETWEEN:-
Veeragandham Satyanarayana,S/o.PothuRaju, aged about36years.Assistant Professor, MAM College, Kesanupalli Village, Narsaraopet Mandal,Guntur District.
...PETITIONER/PETITIONER N0.2/PLAINTIFF N0.2.
AND
1. Allu Venkata Bharathi Lakshmi, W/o. Bala Rama Murthy, aged about 68years, Hindu, Housewife, R/o. Jaladi Village, Yedlapadu Mandal, GunturDistrict.years, Hindu, Housewife, R/o. Jaladi Village, Yedlapadu Mandal, GunturDistrict.
2. Sri SubhodayaEstates,Rep.,byits ManagingPartner,GrandhiChandra Mouleswara Rao, S/o Venkateswarlu, Hindu, aged[about][ 48]years, D.No.6-13/39/1, 13/1, Arundelpet, Guntur Town.Chandra Mouleswara Rao, S/o Venkateswarlu, Hindu, aged[about][ 48]years, D.No.6-13/39/1, 13/1, Arundelpet, Guntur Town.
3. Sri Subhodaya Estates, Rep., by its Managing Partner, Peram SrinivasaRao, S/o Rama Krishna Murthy, Hindu, aged about 49 years, D.No.4-15-69/1, Postal Colony, Guntur Town.Rao, S/o Rama Krishna Murthy, Hindu, aged about 49 years, D.No.4-15-69/1, Postal Colony, Guntur Town.
r
4.Bodduiri Mohan Muralidhar, S/o. Pullaiah, Hindu, aged about 46 yearsBusiness, Thimmapuram Village, Ediapadu Mandal, Guntur[District.]
...Respondents/Respondents
5. Veeragandham Mastanamma, W/o. Pthu Raju, Hindu, aged about 60years. Housewife, R/o Santhagudipadu Village, Rompicherla Mandal,Guntur District.
(R5 not necessary party)
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER N0.1/PLAINTIFF N0.1
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section151 CPC praying thatin the[circumstances]stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in[O.S.No.][ 9][ of][ 2015]in thecourt of the XIII Additional District Judge, Narsaraopet pending the disposalof the Civil Revision Petition and pass Counsel for the Petltioner(s):SRI. T V SRI DEVI
Counsel for the Respondents: SRICHARAN TELAPROLU
The Court made the following:
\
APHC010101682020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT AMARAVATI[|fe(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3460]
TUESDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 712/2020
Between:
...PETITIONER
Veeragandham Satyanarayana
AND
...RESPONDENT(S)
Allu Venkata Bharathi Lakshmi and OthersCounsel for the Petitioner;
1.T VSRI DEVI
Counsel for the Respondent(S);
1.SRICHARAN TELAPROLU
2.G RAJ KUMAR
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION N0.712 of 2020
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The present Civil RevisionPetitionisfiled questioningtheOrder dated 24.12.2019 passed in I.A.No.1267 of 2019 in O.S.No.9of 2015 by the XIII Additional District Judge, Narasaraopet.
2. At the time of hearing, Sri G.Raj Kumar, learned counsel forthe Respondent(s) submits that the suit in O.S.No.9 of 2015wassettled before Lok Adalath on 12.11.2022 and nothing[survives][ for]adjudication in this Revision. A copy of case status of the suit in e-Courts is also placed on record.the Respondent(s) submits that the suit in O.S.No.9 of 2015wassettled before Lok Adalath on 12.11.2022 and nothing[survives][ for]adjudication in this Revision. A copy of case status of the suit in e-Courts is also placed on record.
3. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petitionisdismissed, as infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pendingapplications, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/-M.SRINIVASASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
ff'SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
1. The XIII Additional District Judge, Narsaraopet,[Guntur]District.
2. One CC to Sri. T.V. Sri Devi Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri. Sricharan Telaprolu, Advocate [OPUC]
4. The Section Officer, V.R.Section High Court of A.P.[Amaravathi.]
5. Two C.D Copies.
HIGH COURT
DATED:31/12/2024
ORDERCRP.No.712 of 2020
^of anoh^oO515 FEB 2025a^. Current Section. ^
CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS DISMISSED ASINFRUCTUOUS.