Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/20841/2019 of Suvvada Jaggarao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 30 December 2022
SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO.20841 OF 2019 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed by the petitioners seeking the following relief: “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO.20841 OF 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition is filed by the petitioners seeking the following relief:
“…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 2[nd] respondent in not passing orders on the 3[rd]respondent Proc.Rc.No.5203/2011/E2/Dated 06.02.2017 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 2[nd] respondent to pass orders on the 3[rd] respondent proceedings Rc.No.5203/2011/E2/dated 06.02.2017 duly taking into consideration G.O.Ms.No.571 Revenue(Assn.I) Department dated 14.09.2012 and G.O.Ms.No.607 Revenue(Assn.I) Department Dated 11.10.2012.”
2. The short grievance of the petitioners is that, the 2[nd] respondent is not passing any orders on the 3[rd]respondent’s proceedings Rc.No.5203/2022/E2/Dated 06.02.2017.
3. Heard Sri K.R.Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition for the respondents.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that, if a direction is given to the 2[nd] respondent to consider the petitioners case as per the orders of the 3[rd] respondent, the same would suffice for the time being.
5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on the other hand contended that, as per the instructions of the 2[nd]respondent, the Collector has conducted a meeting with Indo Tibetan Border Police officials and they are reluctant to pay exgratia. In that regard, request was made to the Government to decide the issue regarding payment of exgratia for non-4C encroachers also and they are taking further course of action in that regard and prays to pass appropriate orders.
6. As the issue of the petitioners is under consideration before the Government, instead of keeping this Writ Petition pending, at the request of both the counsels, this Court is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition with the following directions:- The respondent authorities are directed to consider the petitioners case pursuant to the proceedings of the 3[rd]respondent in Rc.No.5203/2011/E2/Dated 06.02.2017, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four(4) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioners. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
30[th] December, 2022 TM
TM
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO.20841 OF 2019
Dated :30.12.2022