Andhra Pradesh High Court
CIVIL APPEAL 42 of 2016 on 5 December 2015
APHC010667182016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
[3369]
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAOCRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 42 OF 2016
Between:
1. SRI VELLA UPENDRA RAO, S/O LATE.JANARDHAN NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O. H.NO. 26/2/1664, CHAITANYA NAGAR, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE. ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O. H.NO. 26/2/1664, CHAITANYA NAGAR, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. NUNNA RUPA KUMA, S/O. DASARADHA RAMAIAH SETTY, OCC: ADVOCATE, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. 17/1/627, CHAKALI STREET, NELLORE, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. ADVOCATE, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. 17/1/627, CHAKALI STREET, NELLORE, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENTS
Revision filed under Section 397and 401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the revision by set aside the Order dated 05.12.2015 in C.C.No.1092 of 2015 passed by the Hon'ble V Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nellore.
IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 61 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No. 1092 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble V Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nellore pending disposal of the present Revision and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.VENKAT RAO RAVULAPALLI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.V BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY
2.SRI K. SANDEEP, ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the order dated 05.12.2015 passed in C.C.No.1092 of 2015 on the file of learned V Additional Judicial Magsitrate of First Class, Nellore (for short, ‘the trial Court’) wherein the trial Court took cognizance for the offences punishable under Section 295-A, 356 and 506 of IPC against the A.1 and A.2. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner/A.2 preferred this Revision.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter would become infructuous in view of recording of compromise in C.C.No.1092 of 2015.
3. Recording the said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and as the cause does not survive for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous.
4. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________
JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
MS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.42 of 2016
Date: 13.10.2025