Chhattisgarh High Court

WP/710/1999 of G.P.GHORE Vs THE GOVT. OF INDIA and ORS. on 4 December 2002

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JUDICA%URE AT JABALPUR (EP) Writ Pemtlon 1x EFL /1999 ggtition uhaer Ar ic1e 226/g27 é: the Constitution’ _ pi lndia; Petitioner G P Ghcre, aon of ’5hri bfijl¢l Gbore, aged about 53 ybar~, r/o unctor R0. 1O 5tr(et 46 Quarter n-. 7 A , abllal, aisbu uurg (MP‘,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

¥§LThE[HICH]COURTOF JUDICA%URE AT JABALPUR (EP)

.

EFL

Writ Pemtlon

1x/1999

ggtition[uhaer]Ar ic1e 226/g27é:theConstitution’

lndia;pi

‘_

Petitioner

G PGhcre,aonof’5hribfijl¢lGbore,agedabout 53 ybar~,r/ounctorR0.1O5tr(et46Quartern-.7A,abllal,aisbuuurg(MP‘, 'Versus HespohdentsTheGavernwentof‘Indie tJroughtheMecret¢ryhepcrtmeptof Persornel"nairaxnxng,New Delhi.

2. lhLdn&on0lnGla,ThraughChairman; iheCentralboardcfEirectTaxes,NormBlock; yew Delhi.V

3. TheChiefCommissionerof IncemetaxH0shengabq&\oadEhopal(MP)

1h;b0mmi<s1on€rof[Ircome]lax,,KdlpurkLPJ.,5.3hr1A.J.Khan,éddl.Cummi$sionerofvincomeTax,Range-I,Raipur(MP).

%%%

Particularsaf the Pe itioner

As givenin'thé cauéetitle.

?articu1ar$bftheRespongéns

Asgivenin tnecausétitle.

XE[LIC]73

3a mmm gm[fong?]f.[miHO]m

WWWWW

31%;? m {Wg‘égzb

DBHON'BLE sHRI K H NKuRAtQGAc Ji& HON BLE sHRI P cNAIK £1l‘a04/12/2002:[-]./mx'/M5hri Sanfosh 6up1'a Sanfosh 6up1'a 6up1'alearned c cWMunsel for for fhe 5hri Sanfosh 6up1'a Sanfosh 6up1'a 6up1'alearned c cWMunsel for for fhe pefifioner.ShmV V5Mur‘fhy,learnaMwwww«_xw~odifionalCenfralGoV‘l'.SfandingCounsel‘ for respondenf No.1.LearnedcounselforTherespondenfhasfiledanapplica‘hon(IANo 7826of2002)fordismissaloafThe WmPetmonon 01/02/2000111er'eaf‘rer Iearned counsel for- fhe gpe‘l'moner' has also flled an appllca‘honi(LA.[No.7sz5][ of][ 2002)]on 03/02/2oéo swing as fouows:

i'i3i

E"2.7haf,fh/s Hon’b/e6012!."7‘Vida order dared22/02/1999hasdirecfediéorissuanceoffhelnaficesfafheréspandenfséinfheabavewr/‘fpe[fifion]MereafferfheBenchof€enfra/Adm/msfrai‘lve THbuna/lms sfg/‘fed fund/awry, andfherefore,fhepef/f/onerfdoesnofwishf0prosecufefhe above per/fieg77w pefifianer hasalso fl/ed an orig/mi app/warm” before fhe Cem‘ra/Admmls‘frafwe Tribunal sfafmg fhe above['facfs'.][ "]

;In View of whaf is shiedin1-applic‘mion (LA. No.7825 ofzooz),‘aéueThe wrlf pe‘h'hon ls dismissed as withdrawn§§ESSd/—l,P.C'NaiklV[Sdl-gJudge§£gig§b£éu£§sChief Justice§‘l'

\V

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead