Gujarat High Court
ITR/193/1988 of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs ARBUDA MILLS LTD on 13 December 2001
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 193 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 193 of 1988
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Versus
ARBUDA MILLS LTD
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MIHIR JOSHI for MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner NOTICE SERVED for Respondent
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 13/12/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA)
#. The following question is referred to this Court at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, for the opinion of this Court.
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was entitled to the deduction in respect of the amount paid to M/s. Mettur Neardhell Ltd. for the use of the Trade Mark "Tabilized" ?"
#. We have heard Mr. Mihir Joshi, learned counsel for the applicant. Though served, none appears on behalf of the respondent. The assessment year is 1979-80. It was fairly pointed out by Mr. Joshi that the question referred by the Tribunal stands concluded in favour of the assessee by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Ashoka Mills Ltd., 218 ITR 526. For the reasons stated in the said decision, we answer the question referred to us in the affirmative i.e.. in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Reference stands disposed off accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
“[B.C. PATEL, J.]”[D.A. MEHTA, J.]
*****
pirzada/-