Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/31126/2024 of AKELLA ALIAS KOTA LALITHA KAMESWARI Vs THE STATE OF AP on 31 December 2024
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31126/2024 Between: Akella Alias Kota LalithaKameswari
APHC010591212024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPAWRIT PETITION NO: 31126/2024
Between:
...PETITIONER
Akella Alias Kota LalithaKameswari
AND
The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KONDIPARTHI V RATNAKAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“….to issue an appropriate Writ , Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 2[nd] and 3[rd]respondents in not taking any action against the Respondents Nos.4, 5 and 6 in pursuant to the Complaint, dated 27.05.2024 given by the Petitioner, inspite of her repeated visits being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 2[nd]and 3[rd ]Respondents to forthwith act upon the complaint dated 27.05.2024 and take action in accordance with law and to grant such….”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that the petitioner appeared before the respondent No.3/SHO and expressed her intention to resolve their family issues with the intervention of their elders and has requested not to take any further action. For ready reference, the relevant portion of the written instructions is extracted below:
“…… Basing on the complaint of the petitioner, the 3[rd]respondent police called the petitioner for preliminary enquiry on 18.06.2024. Further the petitioner appeared before the 3[rd]respondent police expressed her intention to resolve their family issues with the intervention of their elders and has requested that no further action be taken on her petition. Further the 3[rd] Respondent took the statement from the petitioner along with her signature. Further the 3[rd] Respondent sent the reply to the 2[nd] Respondent and closed the petition”
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of.
5. In the light of the instructions extracted supra, the petition is disposed of. No costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________________
DR. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
Date:31.12.2024 SCS
SCS
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.31126 of 2024Dated.31.12.2024