WP/1509/2004 of SUBHASH KAR and ORS. Vs THE STATE OF C.G.and ORS. on 23 December 2004

Fr‘

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH

ATBILASPUR

1

Writ Petition No. [5’0 7of 2004/

PETITIONERS:1'Q«u\z\f»'éQ,.";\rs°b=‘seié‘WQ'e”2.t‘o[by]$5

Subhaskar,aged 47years,S/o.Late Kartik$§hmKan(Village[Assistant)]

PETITIONERS

Secretary Janpat PanchayatSaraipali, TahsilSaraipaliDistrict Mahasamund(C.G.)

Rohidas Taram,Aged35yearsS/o.Shri Ramchandra TaramSarpanch,GramPanchayat wa,JanpadPanchayat-CharamaDistrict Kanker(C.G.)

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS

Stateof Chhattisgarh

:l£5;

ThroughSecretary

Departmentof Panchayat8nRuralDevelopment, D.K.S.Bhawan,Raipur(C.G.)

.iili

CollectorKanlter,

District Kanker(C.G.)

Chief ExecutiveOfficer

JanpadPanchayatCharama

TahsilandDistrict Kanker(C.G.)

//2//

PETITIONUNDERARTICLES226/227‘OFTHECONSTITUTION OFINDIAFOR ISSUANCE OFSUITABLEDIRECTIONS, ORDERS[OR][ WRITS][ INCLUDING][ WRITS][ IN][ THE]NATURE OFCERTIORARI, MANDAMUSETC.

b3[KPIS'OCI/]

mm

W[20%]

mm (Wu)

3a WW

“a3’?%<‘4‘s‘r$ ‘W

i[m0][ Cr]

3:;‘i’62T9?K"’4?“if€51?)

ha W

a?

C!&1Wzooe

WW

~ 13 henna)

WT

XI-}1C~7 8

mm

W[m]4V

m[Tm:](@wa)

5W1aafm‘‘3?mm%%am”g;A1wwwflwmammww_ 4$3f¢m m?!expEaim as 1'0 why fhe amoun‘r sh( uld noT be recovered from Them, andwifhouf any oppom‘uhEryTodefendTheircase, fhey have giving ?hembeen held responsible.Havingheardlearnedcvunseiforihepar’riesandhavingTherecord,Eamof1heopinionThai”Theraisedbyperusedpoin'i'ieamedcounselfor[The]pe'riiionersisreasonable, as fheprinciple[of]‘l'his’rrue‘I’ha‘inaiuraljusficehasbeenviolai'edincase.Ifisrespondenfs No.264 3 and[ ‘ihe][ Governmenf][ were]made[responsible]forcompensafion amount whichwasaresul’r offallingofThewallof awaferfank‘whichwasconsfrLcTedunderfhesupervisionoffhepefi‘i’ioners,[buf][ fhe]pe’rifioners[were][ nof]pariy[before][ The][ Addifional]‘i'hemDisfric‘rJudge,fherefore,fherewasnoopporfunifyfor1'0defendfhecase.Proper course. for Theresponden‘rs was fhaf They'l'oougl’n‘f0haveins‘fifufedaninquiryThefacfwhefherThe"esponsihlepefifionerswerenegligenfandforpoorconsfrucfionorl.csomeofher persons wereresponsible.or poorcons’rrucfion, and The!pefifioners[and fhose][ ofher]persns responsible for poor consfrucfionshouldhavebeenoppor‘fnifyTodefendfheircaseandallowgivenfhem To which fey wanfed foAffer hearing produce record produce.fheoranyofherersonresponsible,Therespondenfspefi’rionersoughf f0have passedThe orderSinoe,r10[opporj‘’w] wW/-§~

XI-i—IC——78

33W, gm,W

m[200][ 4]

wwmwwj

WW (tge'rfgaga)