Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/767/2002 of RAJINDER SINGH and ORS. Vs THE STATE OF C.G.and ORS. on 4 December 2002
L BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS IN THE MATTER OF W.P.7é 72002/ RAJIgDER SINGH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARs7ys/o. DR. B.s. SHEETAL. F“ JAGDISH KAUR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, w/o. DR. RAJINDER SINGH. OTH ARE RESIDENT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
@
§@IJt‘%L
BEFORETHEHON’BLEHIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR(CHHATTISGARH)
INTHEMATTER OF W.P.7é[72002]/
PETITIONERS
RAJIgDERSINGH,AGEDABOUT49YEARs7ys/o.DR.B.s.SHEETAL.F“f JAGDISHKAUR,AGEDABOUT45YEARS,w/o.DR.RAJINDERSINGH.BOTHARERESIDENTOFGANESHRAM NAGAR,DISTRICTRAI-PUR(CHHATTISGARH).
RESPONDENTS
STATEOF CHHATTISGARH,THROUGH :PRINCI PALSECRETARY,MANTRALAYA,D.K.S.BHAWAN,RAIPUR(CHHATTISGARH).
CAPITAL PROJECTOFFICER,SECRETARYr CAPITAL AREAr DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ,MANTRALAYA, RAIPUR(CHHATTISGARH).
DISTRICT REGISTRAR ANDCOLLECTOR OFSTAMPSCOLLECTORATECAMPUS,RAIPUR(CHHATTISGARH).
SUB-REGISTRAR,SUBREGISTRAR OFFICE ,COLLECTORATECAMPUS ,RAIPUR(CHHATTISGARH) \
(b.
”V\
a|: nel el Cn pias7 ae aYif|._oe Booeoaca |oo:—WRIT. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227. OF THE CONSTITUTION orssrs INDIA, FOR ISSUANCE OF ORDER IN NATURE OF WRITS OF_aliaeMANDAMUS /CERTATORARI OR_ANY OTHER ORDER IN NATURE OF WRITS.— Li Li i XLHC-zz Qus’HA/v/r _
_
,
AA§a?mmmL@HWW§fWW§$
¥§,y.
m m
AW My
MH’W?
r
mg
'
‘
_
i
"
¥ mmwWKé?
Wmmm?
04- 12—2002
Shn' Kishore Bhaduri, counsel for the petitioner.Shn' Ranbir Singh, Govt. Aciv. for the State. for the State. the State. State.
iv. for the State. for the State. the State. State.
H€ard
The grievance of the writ petitioner is that thoughl’aif, documentfor reglstratlon was produced bejore the Sub Registrar[—] respondentNo 4herefusedtoentertamthesameandreturnedittothepetitloner[Without]any endorsemeat thereon and without passing anyorder, refusing registration. Accm."dingly, the petitioner is before thisCourt for relief.
Incase whatisallegeda'soveistruenothing preventsthepeiitionerfromservinga noticeionthe Sub Registrar—respondentNo 4calling upon himto accept the document and1f it cannot beregistered, pass an appropriate order to that en'eet, so that the mattermay be taken up before the higher forum. In this View of the matter,learnedcounselforthepetitiorLerispermittedtowithdrawthepetitionwithlibertytoapproaci1theSub—Registrar.Ifforsomereason,theSub-Registrarmid:ithatthedocumentcannotberegistered under the law, it is expected[that]he shall indicate reasonsby passing an order to that eEect.
With the aforesaid observat.on,‘ the petition stands disposed ofas Withdrawn.ConsequentlyLA.No.2078/2002for urgent hearingalso stands disposed of.
‘Sd/—'P.0NaikJudgenTwnA,