Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/5447/2016 of V.Padmanabham, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh rep., by its Principal Secretary on 31 December 2021
SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5447 of 2016 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by the petitioner to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.5447 of 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by the petitioner to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents in regularizing the services of the petitioner as Pump Operator in the 2[nd]respondent-Corporation, as illegal and arbitrary and consequential direction to respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner as Pump Operator.
2. Heard learned counsel on both sides.
3. During the course of hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the 2[nd] respondent-Corporation stated that the petitioner can make a fresh representation to the 2[nd]respondent-Corporation seeking to regularize his services, which can be disposed of by the latter, in accordance with law.
4. Recording the said submission, this Court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions :
i)The petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation before the 2[nd] respondent-Corporation, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. before the 2[nd] respondent-Corporation, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.
ii)On such representation being made, the 2[nd]respondent is directed to consider the same on merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, by following the principles laid down in the Judgment of the Apex Court in Umadevi’s[1] case, within a period of four (4) weeks thereafter, positively. No costs. respondent is directed to consider the same on merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, by following the principles laid down in the Judgment of the Apex Court in Umadevi’s[1] case, within a period of four (4) weeks thereafter, positively. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No costs.
31[st] December,2021. Note : C.C., within a week. B/o RPD
____________________
SRIK.SURESH REDDY,J
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SURESH REDDY
Writ Petition No.5447 of 2016Dated : 31.12.2021
Note : C.C., within a week. B/o RPD