Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/35526/2022 of Udayagiri Rama Lakshmi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 30 December 2022
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.35526 OF 2022 Between:- Udayagiri Rama Lakshmi … Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No.35526 OF 2022
Between:-
Udayagiri Rama Lakshmi
and
… Petitioner
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, and others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : M/s.Pillix Law Firm Counsel for R.1 to R.3 : The G.P. for Revenue
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. With their consent, the writ petition is disposed of.
2. The writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:
“… declaring the inaction of respondent No.3 in not cancelling the Document No.1647/2018 in accordance with Section 23 of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and passing orders for maintenance by making unwarranted and unscrupulous remarks against the son-in-law of the petitioner as illegal arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and against Article 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently to set aside the order passed by respondent No.3 dated 16.4.2022”
3. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner sought to advance arguments with reference to the merits of the case, it appears that against the orders passed by the respondent No.3 dated 16.4.2022 an appeal has been preferred before the respondent No.2 on 01.8.2022 and the same is pending consideration. Therefore, this Court, without going into merits of the case, deems it appropriate to dispose of the matter, with a direction to the respondent No.2 to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner subject to maintainability etc., after giving due opportunity to all the parties, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
December 30, 2022. ANI
________________________
NINALA JAYASURYA, J