Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/7439/2009 of SHYAMLAL MEHAR Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and ORS. on 17 December 2009
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR my. (S) No. ....‘.?.¢.13.’.€ ......m9) a “ Shyam Lal Mehar S/o. Late Shambhuram Mehar, aged about ~ 64 year, R/o. Palace Road Raigarh Tah & Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS f RESPONDENDS z 1. " State of
3mm mm
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH[COURT][ OF][ CHHATTISGARH]AT BILASPURmy. (S)[No.][ ....‘.?.¢.13.’.€][ ......][m9)]
a“
ShyamLalMeharS/o.LateShambhuram Mehar,[aged][ about][ ~]64 year, R/o. Palace[Road][ Raigarh]Tah & Distt. Raigarh (C.G.)Shambhuram Mehar,[aged][ about][ ~]64 year, R/o. Palace[Road][ Raigarh]Tah & Distt. Raigarh (C.G.)
PETITIONER
VERSUS
1. ["]
f
State of Chhattisgarh,
z
RESPONDENDS
Through: Secretary
General Administrative,
Department
D.K.S. Bhavan,[Raipur](C.G.)
i
‘
The District Education[Officer,]
2. Raigarh Tah and Distt.[Raigarh]
(C,G.)
The Joint Director,
Page 1 of 3
Treasury Account &[Pension]
Bilaspur Division,[Bilaspur](C.G.)
WRIT PETITION UNDER[ARTICLE][ 226][ OF]CONSTITUTION OF[INDIA]
Amit
HEGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH‘AT B§LASPUR
WRIT PET§T10N {S}No. 7439 of 200$
PETWIONERShyam La! Mehar.
VERSUS
RESPGNDENTS
:State of Chhattisgarh & Others.
WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTETUTJON OF IND!ASB: Hon’bie shin; Satish K. AanihGtri. J.
Present:Shri Vineet K. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner.Shri PK‘Bhadurt, Pane! Lawyer for the State/respendents.
- ORDER (ORAL)
{Passed[on][ 17‘“][ day][ of][ December,][ 2009)]
1.
Page 2 of 3
Learned ccunset appearing for the petittener submits that despite theorderdated7H3“January,20G9(AnnexureP/3)wherebythepetitioner[has been]granted[the][ benefit][ of][ seccnd][ Kramonnatt;]thepetttionerisnotgettingthebenefitactuaiiyastheJaintDirectcr,Treasury;Accounts3;Pension;Biiaspur Divisionhas directed thepetitienertocontact therespondentNo.2stheDistrictEducationOtncer,Raigarh.ShriPandeyfurthersubmitsthatwhenthepetitioner[met][ with][ the][ respondent][ No.]2. the petitioner was informedthat the order has aiready been passed andthepetitioner[shouid]approach the respondent No. 3 for release of money.Atthisjuncture.ShriThakur,iearnedDeputyAdvocateGeneraiappearingfertheState/respondentsubmitsthatitthepetitionermakes a representationto the respondent No.2, the same shaii beconsidered and order for release of the money shaii be passedinaccordancewiththeorder dated.7/t3‘“January, 2609(AnnexurePIG) within a period of four weeks.
2. in View of the above,.according to iearned counsel appearing for thepetitioner,[nothing][ survives][ for][ adjudication]at this stage.
Cu
/Sdl-Satish[K.][ Agnihom]Judge
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
,,
A.,“
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…