Andhra Pradesh High Court

WRIT PETITION 13726 of 2007 on 3 November 2006

Cites 0, Cited by 0

APHC010291642007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATIWRIT PETITION NO: 13726/2007

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC, DHONE DEPOT., EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD.DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. P M VIJAYAKUMAR ANANTHAPUR ANOTHER, S/O.P.M.PRAKASAM EX.COACH BUILDER C/O.8/386, COURT ROAD, ANANTHAPUREX.COACH BUILDER C/O.8/386, COURT ROAD, ANANTHAPUR

2. THE PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM, LABOUR COURT, ANANTHAPURCOURT, ANANTHAPUR

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to ID.No.62/2003 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour court, Ananthapur and quash the award dated 3.11.2006 by issuing appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 17230 OF 2007

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the award in ID.No.62/2003 dated 3.11.2006 on the file of the industrial Tribunal cum Labour court, Ananthapur pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. P VINAYAKA SWAMY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR LABOUR

2. M V PRATAP REDDY

The Court made the following order:

Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 12.09.2025 and 01.09.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting its case.

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed.

Date: 25.09.2025

MP

___________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

133

MP

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO:13726 of 2007

Date: 25.09.2025

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead