Andhra Pradesh High Court
AS/367/2006 of S. Ramakrishnarao Vs R. Ramamurthy on 31 December 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY , THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO FIRST APPEAL NO: 367 OF 2006 appeal against the judgment & decree dt. 19-09-05 made in OS No. 7/03, on
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RFIRST APPEAL NO: 367 OF 2006
appeal against the judgment & decree dt. 19-09-05 made in OS No. 7/03, on the the Court of the III Addl. Dist. Judge, Kakinada Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. S. Ramakrishnarao, S/o Subbarao Business R/o D.No. 2-23-10, Sarada StSrinagar, Kakinada-3, E.G.Dist. Srinagar, Kakinada-3, E.G.Dist.
...APPELLA
AND
1. R. Ramamurthy, S/o Adinarayanamurthy Business R/o D.No. 43-2-9, Gummellavari Lane, Tilak Street, Kainada, Gummellavari Lane, Tilak Street, Kainada,
2. M/s. Raja Rajeshwari Industries, kakinada, Rep by its Managing partner S. Ramakrishna R/o 2-23-10, Sarada Street, Srinagar, Kakinda, E.G.Dist. Ramakrishna R/o 2-23-10, Sarada Street, Srinagar, Kakinda, E.G.Dist.
...RESPOND
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2006(ASMP. NO: 886 OF 2006)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleascondone the delay of 71 days in filing the appeal
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(ASMP. NO: 885 OF 2006)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleascondone the delay in depositing the defecit court fee i.e., 21 days
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(ASMP. NO: 1741 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasexpedite the hearing of the hearing of the above first appeal by fixing an early d Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRI. GODEY SATISH
Counsel for the Respondents: E V V S RAVI KUMAR & GODA RAMA
Counsel for the Respondents: E V V S RAVI KUMAR
The Court made the following:
2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsrepresenting on behalf of the respondents is alone present. Though the mattlisted under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not inclined to prosecute the appeal.
3. Therefore, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_____________________________
JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA R
Dt.31.12.2024 CVD