CIVIL APPEAL 2471 of 2013 on 26 November 2013

1. KAKARLA SREENIVAANAMANMUR (V), KOSA RAO, S/O. KOTAIAH, OCC: DRIRISAPDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTVER R/O. RICT....PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF A P Maddipadu Police StaREP BY ITS PP, through Station Hoution, prakasam district. Represented byse Officer, its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. Maddipadu Police StaREP BY ITS PP, through Station Hoution, prakasam district. Represented byse Officer, its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENT

Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminCase, the High Court may be pleased to allow the revision petitionaside the judgments passed in CC.No.81 of 2008 on the file of tFirst Class Magistrate, Special Mobile court, Ongole, dt.06.0al Revision by setting he Judicial 2.2013 by convicting the petitioner for the offences punishable under section 304-A, 338 and 337 IPC and the same was confirmed in Crl.A.No.41 of 2013, dt.26.11.2013 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Prakasam Division Ongole.

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CRLRCMP 3835 OF 2013

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstanin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may beces stated pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail by suspending the operation of the Judgments including the sentence made in CC.No.81 of 2008 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Special Mobile court, Ongole, dt.06.02.2013 by convicting the petitioner for the offences punishable under section 304-A, 338 and 337 IPC and the same was confirmed in Crl.A.No.41 of 2013, dt.26.11.2013 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Prakasam Division Ongole, pending disposal of the above Crl.R.C.

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI

Counsel for the Respondent:

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

The Court made the following ORDER:

1. The present Criminal Revision Case, filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity, ‘Cr.P.C.'), is preferred by the petitioner/accused, challenging the Judgment dated 26.11.2013 passed in Crl.A.No.41 of 2013 by the learned Sessions Judge, Prakasam Division, Ongole (for short, ‘the 1[st] Appellate Court’). By the said Judgment, the 1[st]Appellate Court dismissed the appeal, confirming the Judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Special Mobile Court, Ongole, (for short, the ‘Trial Court’) in C.C.No.81 of 2008 dated 06.02.2013.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner/accused appeared.

3. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, representing the 1[st]respondent/State, submitted the Trial Court’s report. A perusal of the report indicates that the accused died on 31.03.2021 due to ill-health at Sanghamithra Hospital, Ongole; the Sub Inspector of Police, Maddipadu police station filed another memo stating that he made enquires at the accused’s residence and confirmed the death of the accused.

4. In view of the death of the petitioner/accused, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as abated.

Interim orders, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated, and all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J

sss

Date: 13.10.2025 S A K

59

S A K

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO

Criminal Revision Case No.2471 of 2013

Date: 13.10.2025