Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/10570/2022 of MUDRABOYINA DILIP Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 30 December 2022
NO: 10570 OF 2022 ...Respondent I.A. NO: 2 OF 2022 The Court made the following: ORDER ...Petitioners/ Accused No.2 & 3 2. Kalavakollu Jamalaiah, S/o. Somaiah, Aged about 20 years, Occ; Coconut Business, R/o. Mallikharjunapeta, Upparavadu, Vijayawada Town, NTR District. AND 1. The State of
<<
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFANDHRAPRADESHATAMARAVA7'l^-*'ifC
FRIDAY,THETHIRTIETHDAYOFDECEMBERTWOTHOUSANDANDTWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THEHONOURABLESRIJUSTICERRAGHUNANDANRAO
CRIMINALPETITIONNO:10570OF2022
Between:1.MudraboyinaDilip,S/o.KoteswaraRao,Age24years,Occ:Student,R/o.D.No.10-13-22,UpparaVaguCenter,MallikharjunaPeta,ITown,Vijayawada,NTRDistrict.(A2)1.MudraboyinaDilip,S/o.KoteswaraRao,Age24years,Occ:Student,R/o.D.No.10-13-22,UpparaVaguCenter,MallikharjunaPeta,ITown,Vijayawada,NTRDistrict.(A2)
2.MudraboyinaKalyan,S/o.KoteswaraRao,Age20years,Occ:Student,R/o.D.No.l0-13-22,UpparaVaguCenter,MallikharjunaPeta,ITown,Vijayawada,NTRDistrict.(A3)D.No.l0-13-22,UpparaVaguCenter,MallikharjunaPeta,ITown,Vijayawada,NTRDistrict.(A3)
...Petitioners/AccusedNo.2&3
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. TheStateofAndhraPradesh,throughStationHouseOfficer,VijayawadaTownPoliceStation,Rep.bythePublicProsecutor,HighCourtatAndhraPradesh,AmaravatiTownPoliceStation,Rep.bythePublicProsecutor,HighCourtatAndhraPradesh,Amaravati
...Respondent
2. KalavakolluJamalaiah,S/o.Somaiah,Agedabout20years,Occ;CoconutBusiness,R/o.Mallikharjunapeta,Upparavadu,VijayawadaTown,NTRDistrict.Business,R/o.Mallikharjunapeta,Upparavadu,VijayawadaTown,NTRDistrict.
...Respondent/Defacto-Complainant
PetitionunderSection482ofCr.P.CprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedintheMemorandumof GroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedtoquashtheproceedingsagainstthepetitioners/AccusedNo.2and3inCCNo.3599of2022onthefileoftheChiefMetropolitanCourt,Vijayawada,NTRDistrict.
I.A.NO:2OF2022
PetitionunderSection482ofCr.P.Cprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedinthe.MemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedtostayallfurtherproceedingsinCCNo.3599of2022onthefileoftheChiefMetropolitanCourtVijayawada,NTRDistrict.
ThisPetitioncomingonforhearing,uponperusingtheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetitionanduponhearingtheargumentsofSriGOUTHAMISURAPAREDDY,AdvocateforthePetitionerandoftheAdditionalPublicProsecutoronbehalfoftheRespondentNo.1, TheCourtmadethefollowing:ORDER
HON’BLESRIJUSTICER.RAGHUNANDANRAO
CRIMINALPETITIONNo.10570OF2022
ORDER;
.4•'''I-•ThepetitionersareAccusedNos.2and3in
CC.No.3599of2022onthefileofChiefMetropolitanCourt,Vijayawada,NTRDistrict,foroffencesunderSection324readwithSection34ofIndianPenalCode.
2. Theallegationagainstthepetitionersandtheotheraccusedisthat,alltheaccusedtogetherhadassaultedthede/acto-complainantwhiletheAccusedNo.1beatthede/acto-complainantwithastickandthepetitionershereinwhoarearrayedasAccusedNos.2and3,hadbeatenthede/acto-complainantwiththeirhandsduetowhichtherewasagrievousinjurytothede/acto-complainant.otheraccusedisthat,alltheaccusedtogetherhadassaultedthede/acto-complainantwhiletheAccusedNo.1beatthede/acto-complainantwithastickandthepetitionershereinwhoarearrayedasAccusedNos.2and3,hadbeatenthede/acto-complainantwiththeirhandsduetowhichtherewasagrievousinjurytothede/acto-complainant.
3. ThepetitionershavenowapproachedthisCourtforquashingthesaidC.C:,onthegroundthattheallegationsmadethereinarefalse;theallegationsaregeneralandomnibusallegationswithoutanyspecificsand;the[T^^petitionerisjoininginaMedicalCollegeforpursuinghis MBBSdegreeandthepresentcasehasbeenfiledonlytospoilhiscareer.
)
!
I
4. Theallegationsinthechargesheetmakeoutacasewhichrequireforatrialbeforeanyconclusioncanbedrawn.ThepoundsraisedbythepetitionersareessentiallyquestionsoffactwhichcannotbetakenbythisCourtinthepresentproceedings.casewhichrequireforatrialbeforeanyconclusioncanbedrawn.ThepoundsraisedbythepetitionersareessentiallyquestionsoffactwhichcannotbetakenbythisCourtinthepresentproceedings.
5. Accordingly,thisCriminalPetitionisdisposedofleavingitopentothepetitionerstosetouttheirdefencesinthecourseoftheTrial.leavingitopentothepetitionerstosetouttheirdefencesinthecourseoftheTrial.
6. However,keepinginviewthefactthatthe©[T5fpetitionerisaMedicalStudent,itwouldbeappropriateto^4©[T5fpetitionerisaMedicalStudent,itwouldbeappropriateto^4
directthatanyapplicationmadebythepetitionerfordispensinghispresenceonspecificoccasions,onaccountof hisstudyschedule,theTrialCourtshallconsidersuchapplicationsliberally.
Miscellaneouspetitions,pendingifany,inthisCriminal Petitionshallstandclosed.
’ ’SD/-M.SRINIVASASSISTANTREGISTRAR
FirstPetitionernameisamendedasSecondpetitionerasperCourtOrderdated.31.07.2023madeinI.A.No.1of2023.
//TRUECOPY//
SD/-M.SRINIVASASSISTANTRE^STRARL,SE^oliJOFFICER
To,
1. TheChiefMetropolitanCourt,Vijayawada,NTRDistrict.,
2. TheStationHouseOfficer,VijayawadaTownPoliceStation,NTRDistrict.3.OneCCtoSriGouthamiSurapareddy,Advocate[OPUC]4.TwoCC’stothePublicProsecutor,HighCourtofA.P.atAmaravati[OUT]5.TwoCDCopies.
HIGHCOURT
DATED:30/12/202231/07/2023
AMENDEDORDER
CRLP.No.10570of2022
S1IAUG2323will’’CurrentSection.
DISPOSINGOFTHECRIMINALPETITION