Gujarat High Court
SCR.A/961/1999 of HARIJAN PALABHAI GOVINDBHAI CHAMAR Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 25 November 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 961 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 961 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- HARIJAN PALABHAI GOVINDBHAI CHAMARVersus STATE OF GUJARAT
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BM MANGUKIYA for Petitioner MR JOSHI, APP, for respondents.
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE
Date of decision: 25/11/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
#. Rule. Mr. Joshi waives service on behalf of the respondents. By consent of parties, matter is taken up today for hearing.
#. The petitioner challenges the order of externment passed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Limbdi on 30th August, 1999, externing the petitioner from Surendranagar, Rajkot, Bhavnagar and Ahmedabad in exercise of powers under Section 56(b) of the Bombay #. It is stated at the Bar by Mr. Mangukia, learned advocate for the petitioner that, as contended in paragraph 3.4, the petitioner had preferred an appeal under Section 60 of the Bombay Police Act, which is registered as Appeal No.126 of 1999. The appeal has been heard on 8th October, 1999 and the Appellate Authority has not rendered the judgment till date, which has put the petitioner to a jeopardy.
#. Mr. Joshi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, states that he will have to verify and confirm if the matter is finally heard and if the decision is yet not rendered. However, the statement made by the petitioner on oath is not controverted. In this view of the matter, the ends of justice would be met if a direction is given to the Appellate Authority to render a judgment on merits within one week from the date of receipt of order of this Court, if not already rendered. Order accordingly.
#. In view of the above direction, Mr. Mangukia does not press this petition on merits. The petition stands dismissed as having not pressed. Rule is discharged. Direct service permitted.
����[ A.L. DAVE, J. ]
gt