Chhattisgarh High Court

WPCR/691/2020 of JITENDRA SINGH RAJPUT Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 24 December 2020

AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 691 of 2020 • Jitendra Singh Rajput S/o Shri Surendra Singh Rajput, Aged About 34 Years R/o Mangala, Police Station Civil Line Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Present Address Village And Post Jhaphal, Police Station Lorami, Tahsil Lorami, District

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPCR No. 691 of 2020

Jitendra Singh Rajput S/o Shri Surendra Singh Rajput,Aged About 34 Years R/o Mangala, Police Station CivilLine Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) PresentAddress Village And Post Jhaphal, Police StationLorami, Tahsil Lorami, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh.Aged About 34 Years R/o Mangala, Police Station CivilLine Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) PresentAddress Village And Post Jhaphal, Police StationLorami, Tahsil Lorami, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home(Jail) Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, RaipurChhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Jail) Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, RaipurChhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director General, Prisons And Correctional ServicesChhattisgarh, Head Quarter- Prisons And CorrectionalServices Chhattisgarh, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District :Raipur, Chhattisgarh Chhattisgarh, Head Quarter- Prisons And CorrectionalServices Chhattisgarh, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District :Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Jail Superintendent, Central Jail BilaspurChhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

---- Respondents

For Petitioner :- Mr. RishiRahul Soni, AdvocateFor State :- Mr. Devesh Verma, G.A.

24/12/2020

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuOrder on Board

1. The petitioner has filed this writ petitionpleading therein that they have already moved anapplication for extension of parole period but theauthorities have not decided their applicationstill date.pleading therein that they have already moved anapplication for extension of parole period but theauthorities have not decided their applicationstill date.

Page 1 of 2

2. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that thepetitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writpetition with liberty to approach the competentauthority by way of filing a reminder applicationand a direction may be issued for considering hisapplication at the earliest.petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writpetition with liberty to approach the competentauthority by way of filing a reminder applicationand a direction may be issued for considering hisapplication at the earliest.

3. The prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. However, if any reminder application isfiled by the petitioner that may be considered atthe earliest.

5. Certified copy today.

Sd/-(Parth Prateem Sahu) Vacation Judge

Vijay Sahu

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead