Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/42289/2022 of Panduri Guruvu Naidu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 December 2022
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.42289 OF 2022 Between:- Panduri Guruvu Naidu … Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.42289 OF 2022
Between:-
Panduri Guruvu Naidu
… Petitioner
and
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, and others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner Counsel for R.1 to R.5
: Mr.G.Venkatesulu Naidu
: The G.P. for Revenue
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, questioning the inaction of the 2[nd]respondent in deleting the petitioner’s agricultural land of an extent of Ac.1.30 cents in survey No.11-5 of Aganampudi village, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District from the list of Prohibited Lands notified under Section 22-A(1)(b) of the Registration Act, as illegal, arbitrary, and for a consequential direction to respondent Nos.1 to 4 to delete the said land from the Prohibited Properties List.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.
3. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner has to make application through on-line, and if the petitioner makes proper application, the respondents will consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon.
5. Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the material on record, the Writ Petition is disposed of, without going to the merits of the case, leaving it open to the petitioner to file an On-line application seeking deletion of the subject matter property from Prohibited Category List within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. On filing such application, the 2[nd] respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders within a period of three (3) months thereafter and communicate the same to the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
December 30, 2022.
vasu
________________________
NINALA JAYASURYA, J