Andhra Pradesh High Court

CIVIL APPEAL 256/2008 on 12 November 2008

APHC010580222008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMAFAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 256/2008

Between:

1. NAKKALA RAJYA LAKSHMI, W/O. SANJEEVA RAO BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, MADHURANAGAR VIJAYAWADA - 520 011.MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, MADHURANAGAR VIJAYAWADA - 520 011.

...APPELLANT

AND

1. NANNEBOYINA SANJEEVA RAO, S/o. Anjaiah Branch Manager , Indian Bank, Brodipet Branch, 4/1, Brodipet, Guntur District.Indian Bank, Brodipet Branch, 4/1, Brodipet, Guntur District.

...RESPONDENT

Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2008(FCAMP 473 OF 2008

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the judgment and decree passed by the Hon'ble Family Court Judge, Guntur in HMOP.No. 56/2008 dated 12.11.2008 pending disposal of the main appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 467 OF 2009

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders granted in FCAMP.No. 473/2008 in FCA.No. 256/2008 dated 26.12.2008

IA NO: 3 OF 2009(FCAMP 22177 OF 2009

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant:

1. G ABDUL KHADER

Counsel for the Respondent:

1. K UDAYA SRI

The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND &

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.256 of 2008

JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

On 29.08.2025, when this matter was listed, there was no representation on either side. Accordingly, this matter was posted to 10.09.2025 under the caption “for dismissal”. On that day also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. To give one more opportunity to the appellant, it was posted to today. Today also, there is no representation. Hence, it appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the case.

2. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________

JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

Date:24.09.2025 SCS

__________________________________

JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND &

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.256 of 2008

Dt.24.09.2025

SCS

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead