Andhra Pradesh High Court
CIVIL APPEAL 256/2008 on 12 November 2008
APHC010580222008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMAFAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 256/2008
Between:
1. NAKKALA RAJYA LAKSHMI, W/O. SANJEEVA RAO BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, MADHURANAGAR VIJAYAWADA - 520 011.MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, MADHURANAGAR VIJAYAWADA - 520 011.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. NANNEBOYINA SANJEEVA RAO, S/o. Anjaiah Branch Manager , Indian Bank, Brodipet Branch, 4/1, Brodipet, Guntur District.Indian Bank, Brodipet Branch, 4/1, Brodipet, Guntur District.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2008(FCAMP 473 OF 2008
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the judgment and decree passed by the Hon'ble Family Court Judge, Guntur in HMOP.No. 56/2008 dated 12.11.2008 pending disposal of the main appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 467 OF 2009
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders granted in FCAMP.No. 473/2008 in FCA.No. 256/2008 dated 26.12.2008
IA NO: 3 OF 2009(FCAMP 22177 OF 2009
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G ABDUL KHADER
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. K UDAYA SRI
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND &
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.256 of 2008
JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
On 29.08.2025, when this matter was listed, there was no representation on either side. Accordingly, this matter was posted to 10.09.2025 under the caption “for dismissal”. On that day also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. To give one more opportunity to the appellant, it was posted to today. Today also, there is no representation. Hence, it appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the case.
2. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date:24.09.2025 SCS
__________________________________
JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND &
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.256 of 2008
Dt.24.09.2025
SCS
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…