Andhra Pradesh High Court

WRIT PETITION 26886 of 2025 on 19 May 1992

APHC010505862025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH(AT AMARAVATI Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3460]

FRIDAY, THE TTWO THWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER OUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 26886/2025

Between:

...PE

A.S.T.Babu

AND

The Depot Manager APSRTC and others

The Depot Manager APSRTC and others

Counsel for the Petitioner

1.PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR SERVICES II

2.

The Court made the following order: ing order:

The Court made the following order: ing order:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

Page 1 of 3

O R D E R:

In the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner is questioning the action of the Respondents in not restoring petitioner’s increment and refixing the pay pursuant to the orders of this Court in W.P.No.24986 of 2014 as illegal and arbitrary.

2. The Petitioner was appointed as conductor on 19.05.1992 and his services were regularized on 19.11.1992. While so, vide orders dated 24.03.2012, the petitioner was imposed punishment of stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect and the same was confirmed by 3[rd]respondent vide orders dated 17.01.2014. Questioning the same, the petitioner filed W.P.No.24986 of 2014 before this Court and the said writ petition was disposed of on 19.02.2024 and the order of punishment was modified to stoppage of two annual increments without cumulative effect and without back wages. The relevant portion of the order is extracted below:

“Considering the spotless career of the petitioner, the Appellate authority has rightfully reinstated the petitioner. In so far as, imposing of the punishment of deferment of two annual increments with cumulative effect is concerned. There is no reason mentioned why the Appellate Authority was imposing such punishment and at the same time the back-wages have been denied to the petitioner. Considering the same, the punishment of denial of back-wages to the petitioner is not disturbed however, the punishment imposed by the Appellate Authority dated 24.03.2012 is modified to the extent of reduction of two annual increments for a period of two (02) years without cumulative effect.”

The grievance of the petitioner now is that, inspite of modification of the order of punishment by this Court in W.P.No.24986 of 2014, the respondents VN,J

Page 2 of 3

are not refixing the pay. It is also submitted that the petitioner had submitted the representation on 02.12.2024 and the same is pending with respondents corporation.

3. The learned standing counsel for the respondent corporation submits that the representation as well as the order of this Court in W.P.No.24986 of 2014 dated 02.12.2024 shall be taken note and appropriate orders would be passed by the respondents.

4. Considering the same submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to examine the representation of the petitioner dated 02.12.2024, in the light of the orders passed by this Court W.P.No.24986 of 2014 dated 19.02.2024 within a period of three (03) months and re-fix the pay of the petitioner.

(ii) There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Date: 26.09.2025

GRL

__________________

NYAPATHY VIJAY, J

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 26886 of 2025

Dt. 26.09.2025

GRL

VN,J

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead