Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/30625/2013 of Sri Maddimaanu Gurrappa Swamy Nithya Annadhaana Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal on 31 December 2024
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] TUESDAY , THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 30625/2013 Between: Sri Maddimaanu Gurrappa Swamy Nithya Annadhaana and Others
APHC010752542013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3310](Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAOWRIT PETITION NO: 30625/2013
Between:
Sri Maddimaanu Gurrappa Swamy Nithya Annadhaana and ...PETITIONER(S)Others
AND
The Government Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal ...RESPONDENT(S)and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. V R REDDY KOVVURI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. G RAMANA RAO (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS RAYALASEEMAREGION)
2. G RAMANA RAO
3. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following Order:
This Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
“….to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Notice in RC.No.Nil/2013, dated 10-10-2013 issued by the respondent No.5 calling upon the members of the petitioner No.1 to vacate the Nithya Annadaana Satram situated in an extant of Ac.0.45 Cents in Sy.No.772 of Rangasamudram Village fields, Porumammilla Mandal, YSR District and interfering with day to day activities of petitioner No.1 is highly illegal, colourable, exercise of power and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to members of Petitioner No.1 under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the Notice in RC.No.Nil/2013, dated 10-10-2013 issued by the respondent No.5….”
2. On an earlier occasion i.e., on 03.12.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and the matter was directed to be posted on 10.12.2024.
3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners either personally or through advocate. It seems that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute the case.
4. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
BMS
__________________________
Dr. K. MANMADHA RAO, J