Andhra Pradesh High Court
WRIT PETITION 2398 of 2018 on 22 December 2017
APHC010054112018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2398/2018
Between:
Madhu Kiran and Others
AND
...PETITIONER(S)
State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
...RESPONDENT(S)
1.POLANKI ANAND SURYA
2.SRINIVASA RAO MADIRAJU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer:
“…..to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring that a) Petitioners are entitled to the benefit of Para-4 of G.O.Ms.No.6, dated.30.4.2015. b) not extending the said benefit is in violative of Article 14.16.21 and 300(A) of the Constitution of India. c) further declare that petitioners are entitled to pay fixation in the Revised Pay Scales of 2015 given the benefit of fitment which was extended to all other Government employees who were in receipt of pre Revised Scales of Pay and WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring that a) Petitioners are entitled to the benefit of Para-4 of G.O.Ms.No.6, dated.30.4.2015. b) not extending the said benefit is in violative of Article 14.16.21 and 300(A) of the Constitution of India. c) further declare that petitioners are entitled to pay fixation in the Revised Pay Scales of 2015 given the benefit of fitment which was extended to all other Government employees who were in receipt of pre Revised Scales of Pay and not extending the same to the petitioners is illegal and arbitrary. d) and pass such other order or orders…...”
2. Heard Sri M.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education, appearing for the respondents.
3. During hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the matter is squarely covered by the common order passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.3735 of 2018 and batch, dated 25.03.2025, and hence, requests this Court to pass similar order in this petition also. The operative portion of the said order is as follows:- “4.Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petitions are disposed of directing the Government to consider the representation dated 22.12.2017 of the Petitioners relating to their claim of fitment vide Para No.4 of G.O.Ms.No.46 dated 30.04.2015 and take appropriate decision according to governing Rules and Law, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order…..”
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education, appearing for the respondents does not refute the said submission.
5. Considering the submissions made, this Writ Petition is also disposed of in terms of the common order passed in W.P.Nos.3735 of 2018 and batch, dated 25.03.2025. There shall be no order as to costs.
6. The Registry is directed to attach a copy of the common order passed in W.P.Nos.3735 of 2018 and batch, dated 25.03.2025, to this order.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________________________
Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date: 25.04.2025
ARR
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2398/2018
Dt.25.04.2025
ARR