Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/689/2020 of VEERAGANDHAM SATYANARAYANA Vs ALLU VENKATA BHARATHI LAKSHMI on 31 December 2024
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY , THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISIONPETITIONNO: 689 OF 2020 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dt 24.12.2019 in I.A.No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
TUESDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISIONPETITIONNO: 689 OF 2020
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against theorder dt 24.12.2019 in I.A.No. 1268 of 2019 in O.S.No. 9 of 2015in thecourt of the XIII Additional District Judge, Narsaraopet.
Between:
Veeragandham Satyanarayana, S/o Pothu Raju, aged about[36]years.Assistant Professor, MAM College, Kesanupalli Village, NarsaraopetMandal, Guntur District.
...Petitioner / Petitioner No.2 / Plaintiff No.2
AND
1.Allu Venkata Bharathi Lakshmi, W/o Bala Rama Murthy, aged about 68years, Hindu, Housewife, R/o Jaladi Village, Yedlapadu Mandal, GunturDistrict.years, Hindu, Housewife, R/o Jaladi Village, Yedlapadu Mandal, GunturDistrict.
2. Sri Subhodaya Estates,, Rep by its Managing Partner, uranani ChandraMouleswara Rao, S/o Venkateswarlu, Hindu, aged about 48 years,D.No.6-13/39/1, 13/1, Arundelpet, Guntur Town. Sri Subhodaya Estates,, Rep by its Managing Partner, uranani ChandraMouleswara Rao, S/o Venkateswarlu, Hindu, aged about 48 years,D.No.6-13/39/1, 13/1, Arundelpet, Guntur Town.
3.Sri Subhodaya Estates,, Rep by its Managing Partner, Peram SrinivasaRao, S/o Rama Krishna Murthy, Hindu, aged about 49 years, D.No.4-15-69/1, Postal Colony, Guntur Town.Sri Subhodaya Estates,, Rep by its Managing Partner, Peram SrinivasaRao, S/o Rama Krishna Murthy, Hindu, aged about 49 years, D.No.4-15-69/1, Postal Colony, Guntur Town.
4. Boddulri Mohan Muralidhar,, S/o Pullaiah, Hindu, aged about 46 yearsBusiness, Thimmapuram Village, Ediapadu Mandal, Guntur District.Business, Thimmapuram Village, Ediapadu Mandal, Guntur District.
5.Veeragandham Mastanamma,, W/o Pthu Raju, Hindu, aged[about][ 60]years. Housewife, R/o Santhagudipadu Village, Rompicherla Mandal,Guntur District.years. Housewife, R/o Santhagudipadu Village, Rompicherla Mandal,Guntur District.
(Respondent No.5 is not necessary party,)
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. T V SRI DEVI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos 2 & 3: SRI. G. RAJ KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI. SRICHARAN TELAPROLU
The Court made the following;
\
APHC010101712020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT AMARAVATI[3460](Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 689/2020
Between:
...PETITIONER
Veeragandham Satyanarayana
AND
...RESPONDENT(S)
Allu Venkata Bharathi Lakshmi and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.T VSRI DEVI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.SRICHARAN TELAPROLU
2.G RAJ KUMAR
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The present Civil Revision Petitionis filed questioningtheOrder dated 24.12.2019 passed in I.A.No.1268 of 2019 in O.S.No.9of 2015 by the XIII Additional District Judge, Narasaraopet.
2. At the time of hearing, Sri G.Raj Kumar, learned counsel forthe Respondent(s) submits that the suit in O.S.No.9 of 2015 wassettled before Lok Adalath on 12.11.2022 and nothing[survives][ for]adjudication in this Revision. A copy of case status of the suit in e-Courts is also placed on record.the Respondent(s) submits that the suit in O.S.No.9 of 2015 wassettled before Lok Adalath on 12.11.2022 and nothing[survives][ for]adjudication in this Revision. A copy of case status of the suit in e-Courts is also placed on record.
3. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petitionisdismissed, as infructuous.dismissed, as infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pendingapplications, if any, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-M.PRABHAKAR RAOASSISTANT REGISTRAR
)r ^SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The XIII Additional District Judge, Narsaraopet (with[records][ if][ any)]
2. One CC toM/s. T V Sri Devi Advocate [OPUC]
3.
One CC to Sri. Sricharan Telaprolu Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to Sri. G. Raj Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]
5. The Section Officer, V R Section, High Court of Andhra[Pradesh][ at]
Amaravathi.
6. Three CD Copies
HIGH COURT
DATED:31/12/2024
ORDER
CRP.No.689 of 2020
ifbfg15 FEB 2025Co^, Current Section
DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS