Gujarat High Court
SCA/6426/1998 of GAMMERBHAI HARJIBHAI RABARI Vs UNION OF INDIA on 2 December 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6426 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.N.MATHUR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6426 of 1998
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.N.MATHUR
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- GAMMERBHAI HARJIBHAI RABARIVersus UNION OF INDIA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR TR MISHRA for Petitioner MR BHARAT T RAO for Respondent No. 1 MR DARSHAN M PARIKH for Respondent No. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE N.N.MATHUR Date of decision: 02/12/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
1. Rule. Mr.Darshan Parikh waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.2. Mr.B.T.Rao waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.1. Heard the Ld.counsel for the parties. Considering the claim made by the petitioner before the Asstt.Labour Commissioner, in his application, dated 30.10.95 and the reply to the same given by the respondents, dated 8.2.96, in my view the claim of the petitioner is required to be adjudicated.
2. Consequently, this SCA is allowed and the impugned order, dated 11.11.1997 is quashed and set aside. The respondent No.1 is directed to reconsider the case and pass appropriate order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of writ. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. No costs.
...