Gujarat High Court

FA/12/1984 of GUJARAT STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION Vs SWAMI KRIDHNACHARANDASJI GURUPURNI on 22 December 2000

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No 12 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

FIRST APPEAL No 12 of 1984

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO

to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- GUJARAT STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION

Versus

SWAMI KRISHNACHARANDASJI GURUPURANI,SWAMI KRISHNA

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

MR MD PANDYA for Petitioner

MR PM RAVAL for Respondent No. 1 MR GAURANG H BHATT for Respondent No. 2

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE

Date of decision: 22/12/2000

ORAL JUDGEMENT

Heard the Ld.Advocate Ms.Maya Desai for the appellant and Mr.Harin Raval for respondents.

2. Learned advocate Ms.Maya Desai seeks leave to reduce the claim from Rs.45,742/- to Rs.42,742/-. Permission for reducing the amount of claim is granted.

3. Before effective hearing of this appeal learned advocates for the parties have submitted that the parties to the litigation have settled the matter out of the court and the respondents have agreed to accept the sum of Rs.42,742/- as compensation instead of Rs.45,742.10ps awarded to the them.

4. In view of the above settlement the appeal is allowed and the judgment and decree passed by the trial court in MACP No.84/81 is quashed and set aside and it is directed that a fresh decree be drawn in pursuance of the agreement arrived amongst the parties. Rest of the decree and judgtment shall remain as it is. There shall be no order as to costs.

22.12.2000����(A.R.DAVE,J)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead