Gujarat High Court
SCA/6409/1985 of DIPAK C DOSHI Vs WANKANER MUNICIPALITY on 28 November 1997
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6409 of 1985 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6432 OF 1985 Date of decision: 28-11-1997 For Approval and Signature The Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. K. KESHOTE 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6409 of 1985
WITH
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6432 OF 1985
��Date of decision: 28-11-1997
For Approval and Signature
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. K. KESHOTE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment? fair copy of the judgment?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India,1950 or any order made thereunder? question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India,1950 or any order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- DIPAK C DOSHI
Versus
WANKANER MUNICIPALITY
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR SURESH M SHAH for Petitioners
MR Bharat Pandya for Respondent
in both the petitions.
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
Date of decision: 28/11/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT
In both these special civil applications the petitioners have come out with common grievance and as such they are taken up together and are disposed of by this common order.
Services of the petitioners came to be terminated by the respondent under notice dated 24th October, 1985 on the ground stated therein. This court has protected the petitioners by granting interim relief, and for all these years they are continuing in service. The interest of justice will be served if the respondent is directed to consider the case of the petitioners in the changed circumstances as to whether they should be continued in service or not. In case the respondent decides that the petitioners cannot be allowed to continue in service, reasoned order may be passed and copy of the same may be sent to the petitioners by registered post A.D. Till this exercise is taken and completed, the interim relief granted by this Court shall continue and in case orders adverse to the petitioners are passed, then those orders shall not be given effect to for 15 days from the date of communication thereof to the petitioners. Liberty to the petitioners for revival of these petitions in case of difficulty.
Subject to the aforesaid observation and direction, rule stands disposed of in both the petition. No order as to costs.
.........
csm