Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/42320/2022 of SHAIK MASTHAN VALI Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.42320 OF 2022 Between:- Shaik Masthan Vali … Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

WRIT PETITION No.42320 OF 2022

Between:-

Shaik Masthan Vali

and

… Petitioner

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, and others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : M/s J.U.M.V. Prasad Counsel for R.1 to R.5

: The G.P. for Revenue

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.

2. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition, in short, is that despite making F-Line application on 28.6.2022 seeking to conduct survey and fix boundaries in respect of the land of the petitioner being an extent of Ac.2.00s in Survey No.642 of Chunchu Yerragudi Village, Krishna Giri Mandal, Kurnool District, no steps have been taken by the respondents so far.

3. When an application is made seeking for survey and fixation of boundaries, the concerned Tahsildar is required to take appropriate decision in terms of Section 10(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 and intimate the decision thereon to the parties under Section 10(2) of the said Act. The legal position in this regard has been succinctly dealt with in the orders dated 19.2.2020 by a learned Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No.2674 of 2020. In view of the same, the 4[th] respondent is directed to take appropriate action on the petitioner’s F-Line application dated 28.6.2022 and intimate the decision under Section 10(1) and Section 10(2) of the said Act respectively, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

December 30, 2022.

Note:

Registry is directed to attach a copy of order dt.19.2.2020 in W.P.No.2674 of 2020. (By order) ANI

________________________

NINALA JAYASURYA, J

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead