SECOND APPEAL 1398 of 2004 on 19 September 1999

1. GULLAPALLI RADHAKRISHNAN

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. The Court made the following Judgment:-

1. This Second Appeal has been filed by the Appellant/Appellant/defendent under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the Decree and Judgment dated July 16,2004 in A.S.No.7 of 1999 on the file of the V Additional District Judge, Rajahmundry, confirming the decree and Judgment dated September 19, 1999, in O.S.No.207 of 1993 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry.

2. In the morning session, when the matter was called for hearing, no representation was made on behalf of the Appellant despite the presence of learned counsel for the Respondents. In light of his absence, the matter was subsequently passed over until 2:15 PM.

3. In the afternoon session as well, there was no appearance on behalf of the Appellant. Although the matter was explicitly listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, no representation was forthcoming on behalf of the Appellant. His absence indicates a lack of intent or interest on his part to further proceed with the Appeal.

4. Consequently, due to the absence of the Appellant and his failure to appear, and to take steps to represent the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

5. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Appeal, shall stand closed.

________________________

T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J

Date: 14.10.2024 RMD

RMD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO

S.A.No.1398 of 2004

Date: 14.10.2024