Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/7183/2006 of SMT.SANDHYA CHANDRAKAR Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and ORS. on 22 December 2006
COURT VOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIoms; No. “83 /2006 : /Smt. Sandhya Chandrakar, W/o. Manoj Kumar, aged about 35 years, Occupation Government Servant, Govt. H.S.School Koma, District Mahasamund (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Tribal Welfare Department
VOF
COURTCHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR
IN THE HIGH COURT
WRIT PETITIoms;[No.][“83]/2006
PETITIONER
:
/Smt.SandhyaChandrakar,W/o.Manoj Kumar, aged[about]35 years,OccupationGovernmentServant,Govt.H.S.SchoolKoma,DistrictMahasamund (CG)Manoj Kumar, aged[about]35 years,OccupationGovernmentServant,Govt.H.S.SchoolKoma,DistrictMahasamund (CG)
RESPONDENTS
:1)
VERSUS
Chhattisgarh,Through
Stateof
TribalWelfare
Secretary,Department,Department,
Bhavan,
DKS
Mantralaya,[Railaur](C.G.)
:2)Commissioner,
TribalWelfareDepartment
Chhattisgarh[Raipur](C.G.)
Assistant Commissioner
.TribalWelfare,MahasamundDistrict Mahasamund(C.G.)District Mahasamund(C.G.)
Page 1 of 3
WRIT PETIION[UNDER][ ARTICLES][ 226i.”][ ~_]OF THE CONSTITUTION[OF][ INDIA]
:The petitioners[most][ respectfully][ state][ as][ under]
PARTICULARS[OF][ THE][ PETITIONER][ :—]
As shown[in][ the][ Cause][ Title.]
h
r
L\
HIéH CGURT OF CHHATTI5$ARH AT BILAsPUR
W.P.(s)[No.][ ?183/][ 2006]
Pe’fi‘fianer:Sm'f. Sandhya Chandmkar
VersusRespondefrfs:
Sm're of Chhu'i’i'isgarh and a1’hers
SB: Hsn'bk Mr. JuS‘Hce Safish K.
AgnEho‘fPi, J
Mr. Mahroaj Mam, Advocate for The peti'rioner.
Miss Suni‘m Jain , Pane! hwyer for fhe responden‘rs/S'rufe.
O R D E R
(Passed[on][ 22“][ day][ of][ December,][ 2006)]
Page 2 of 3
The fsHowirig order 0f 1412 Cour-I“ is passed by Sn'fish K.Agnihci‘ri, J, 1‘Learneé mussel uwearmg for fhz pe?i+ioner as we" as learnad Pam!iawyar appearing for The responden'fs/Sfa’fejcie1+¥y[submif][ Thu?][ fhe]iawyar appearing for The responden'fs/Sfa’fejcie1+¥y[submif][ Thu?][ fhe]facts of[ fr'ae] przsen'f mse are simihr1's['Hm‘f]6f in W. P. No. 1890 of2003 (Chha??isgarh Shikchak 5mgh (Teachers Associa'i'ion) Vs. Ski'sof Chhaftisgavh & others), which was disposed of Vida order dares a”of Aprii, 2905. They furfher submi'f +§m+['l'he]ques+ion[of][ kw][ invo§ved]2003 (Chha??isgarh Shikchak 5mgh (Teachers Associa'i'ion) Vs. Ski'sof Chhaftisgavh & others), which was disposed of Vida order dares a”of Aprii, 2905. They furfher submi'f +§m+['l'he]ques+ion[of][ kw][ invo§ved]is also["Hie]some.
2. In View of ihe above shied submissions made ry learned counsei for+he por'i'ies, +his peiifionis disposed ofin ierms of Tho order da-red6H1 o‘f Iiprii, 2605 passed by *his Cour? in W. P. No. 1890 of 2003. No+he por'i'ies, +his peiifionis disposed ofin ierms of Tho order da-red6H1 o‘f Iiprii, 2605 passed by *his Cour? in W. P. No. 1890 of 2003. No order as[“E'o]cosis.
Sd/—Satish K. AgniimiriJudge
i
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…