Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/1080/2002 of KUMARI URMILA BAI Vs SR.DIV.ELECT.ENG.S.E.RAILWAY and ORS. on 5 December 2003
OF CHPIATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. ^ W.P. No. ^^0 /2002 d^ 3 PETITIONER : Kumari Urmila Bai^ D/0 Late Bidbar, aged about 35 years^ Qr» No» 721/2 ,Rail^ay Sew Loco Colony Bilaspur (C»G») ^ .-.,_,J RESPONDENTS : ^^^y^^y <^^^ ^ .y^ Vs. ^ lo Sr^ Divio Elect»
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
d^3IN THE HIC^i^OURT OF CHPIATTISGARH AT BILASPUR.^^^0W.P. No. /2002PETITIONER:Kumari Urmila Bai^D/0 LateBidbar,aged about35 years^Qr» No»721/2,Rail^ay[Sew]Loco Colony Bilaspur(C»G»)Vs.^RESPONDENTS:loSr^Divio Elect» Engineer(G)SoE» Railway Bilaspur(C»G<i)Sr^Divl. Personnel officer^^^SeE^ Railvjay Bilaspur(G<Go)3* The Union of India,^y^^y<^^^Through the Secretary^^.y^Ministry of Railv/ay^New Delhi.^PETITION LTNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.-.,_,J
3^t?r ^f^s
^f^s^S.^0'..!^^/ ° ^
[^^fe^