WP/2466/2005 of P.M.SHUKLA Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER on 24 December 2014

N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURWRIT PETITION N0:2-4<6 /2005. ^j^J)

P. M. Shukla, S/o Shri P. N. Shukla, M. Shukla, S/o Shri P. N. Shukla, Shukla, S/o Shri P. N. Shukla, S/o Shri P. N. Shukla, Shri P. N. Shukla, P. N. Shukla, N. Shukla, Shukla,aged about about53 years, R/o, 106-A, H. years, R/o, 106-A, H. R/o, 106-A, H. 106-A, H. H.S.C.L.Colony,RuabandhaSector,P. O. Bhilai, Distt. Durg, (C.G.) O. Bhilai, Distt. Durg, (C.G.) Bhilai, Distt. Durg, (C.G.) Distt. Durg, (C.G.) Durg, (C.G.) (C.G.)(Ex -employee of H.S.C.L., -employee of H.S.C.L., of H.S.C.L., H.S.C.L.,P.No.18951, Designation: Crane Operation) Designation: Crane Operation) Crane Operation) Operation)

PETITIONERP. M. Shukla, S/o Shri P. N. Shukla, M. Shukla, S/o Shri P. N. Shukla, Shukla, S/o Shri P. N. Shukla, S/o Shri P. N. Shukla, Shri P. N. Shukla, P. N. Shukla, N. Shukla, Shukla,aged about about53 years, R/o, 106-A, H. years, R/o, 106-A, H. R/o, 106-A, H. 106-A, H. H.S.C.L.Colony,RuabandhaSector,P. O. Bhilai, Distt. Durg, (C.G.) O. Bhilai, Distt. Durg, (C.G.) Bhilai, Distt. Durg, (C.G.) Distt. Durg, (C.G.) Durg, (C.G.) (C.G.)(Ex -employee of H.S.C.L., -employee of H.S.C.L., of H.S.C.L., H.S.C.L.,P.No.^^'?/ x<3/18951, Designation: Crane Operation) Designation: Crane Operation) Crane Operation) Operation)/'5\W/ ^f^Ty'^^^" ^' /VERSUSy^y^'RESPONDENTS1)Union of India,Through: Secretary, Ministry ofIronandSteel,ParliamentHouse, New Delhi.•

^'[2)]HindustanSteelWorksConstructionLtd.(APublicSectorEnterprise),throughits 1»Chairman-Cum-ManagingDirector, Kolkata.3)HindustanSteelWorksConstructionLtd.(Local Unit atBhilai )throughGeneralManager,P,O.Bhilai,Distt.Durg (C.G.)c^^^WRITPETITIONUNDER ARTICLE226/227OFTHE^v^FORISSUANCEOFAWRITOF:)t>"'IJ'L(^^^•^CERTIORARIAND/MANDAMUSANDANYOTHER•ar?;:<l•1:i. ' S^^QMmmm,•»S8?"WRIT/DIRECTION / ORDER.

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUfi

SB:HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

Writ Petition No.2466 of2005

PETITIQNER

P.M. Shukla

RESPONDENTS

Versus

Union of India and others

Writ Petition NoJ146tf)£

•R.B. Nayak7-4^^'.'S^~sfc^iLl',Usfi-flakfrSiWl f'ETITIQNER

RESPONDENTSUnion of India and others^w^n-~:'i-i:MErttieti(Kl>n No.2468 of 2005

'i-ic^^q uRIrTPETITIQ^NERPrayag Choubey

Versus

RESPONDENTSUnion of India and others

Writ Petition No.4730 of 2005PETITLOMERSukaloo Ram RESPONDENTS

Versus

Union of India and others

And

Writ Petition No.4839 of 2005

PETITIONERNiazAliVersusRESPONDENTSUnion of India and others WRIT PETITIONS UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA

Appearanca is: fg jlli •I11M,..<iS|)ri1kJ®fn'[Pandey,][ Advocate][ for'ffT8,Pej|G@ngrs.]..lii.lRI'fri N.K. Vyas, Assistant Solicitor GeneW!,jKByffijon pf India.g;|g''a°Shri Vinod DeshmLikbnAdvocate for ResponSgO&gi;,,,NAVIN SINHA, ACTIN©JfeUJ1.HeardLeameB.iifoiansellllforthePetitionersandtheRespondents.^KV^ uTOt2.At the outset leave is sought to withdraw the applications.3.The writ applications are dismissed as withdrawnSd//.ActingChiefJusticesunita