Chhattisgarh High Court

WP/2487/2001 of PRADEEP SWARNKAR Vs ADHIKSHAK BHOUTIK SANYAUTRA OFFICE on 28 November 2001

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT‘ BILASPUR W.P. No.2l/8’Z/2001 /’) ‘ PETITIONER :- \Aradeep Swamkar S/o M.L. Swamkar, 1’“ R/o Madhakuti, Ramkund Raipur (C.G.)lbw»)? gwjv M24 VERSUS RESPONDENTS:- 1‘ Adhikshak Bhautik Sanyantra Office Of Adhikshak Bhautik

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

‘

IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT‘BILASPUR

No.2l/8’Z/2001

W.P.

/’)

PETITIONER

:-\AradeepSwamkarS/oM.L.Swamkar,R/oMadhakuti,RamkundRaipur(C.G.)

1’“

lbw»)?gwjvM24

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS:-

1‘AdhikshakBhautikSanyantra Office Of AdhikshakBhautikSanyantraIndiraGandhalKrlshlUnlvers1tyStateof Chhattlsgarh/2ThroughChlef Secretary D.K.BhawanRa1pur(C[G)]a[Wée-CMMLWJZ]11311&d3m61amlhwVKgipuKWiv» ZlS ORPRalpur WritPetitionUnderArticle226/227of theConstitutioinof India x V1‘L‘:lr‘

XI-HC-22

‘’‘_._‘g“4,l x

‘‘mwi?kém

W‘mmm28 n 2001shn' Manoj[Paranjapc][ for][ the]petitioner.EThematter relatestoinviting tender[for][ construction][ of][ certain]building of Indira[Gandhi][ Kn'shi][ Vishwa][ Vidyalaya‘xR’aipur.][ Today][ is]said to be[the][ last][ date][ for][ subl][ Jission][ of][ tender][ papers.][ Tender]havenotbeenissuedtothewritpet'm'onerWithoutpapersassigning any[reason.][ The]petitioner[aserts][ that][ he][ has][ a][ right][ to]submitthetenderpapersandtocompetealong-withothers.According[to][ the][ writ]petitioner[he][ is][ an][ eligible][ person][ to][ compete.]Shri Gautam[Bhaduri][ appearing][ for][ the][ respondent-state][ submits]'tthat may[be]primafaciethepioner isnot abletofulnll thecondition/criteriaexpectedofa.competetor.ShriParanjape{that'submitsif ultimately[the]petitioner[is][ unable][ to][ fulhll][ the]tenderconditionsitisforthecompetentauthorityto, decideaccordinglybutheshouldbepermittedtosubmithistender‘teria laid-down by the competentpapers.According[to][ him][ the c]authorityis[fulnlled][ by][ the][ writ]p[titioner.],M<‘x,In my View[no]prejudice[will][ be][ cLused][ to][ anyone][ if][ I][ direct][ that][ the]er papers so[as][ to][ enable][ him][ to]petitioner[be][ given][ necessary][ te]submit them[and]ultimately1tsfor the competent[authority][ to]examine such[tender]papers[on]erit and take[necessary][ action][ in]Vthis regard.i.iaxmew V9'\V\\

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead