Chhattisgarh High Court

WP/3629/2004 of KUMESH KUMAR JAIN Vs MANOHAR LAL and ORS. on 24 December 2004

• ^?CC--' A ?_ BI£ASPffi (XSBWS13GSSE) i:IIIJN! t; WBIT FSsxsres yoS.&zse^ sow M Eiianar Jain, Props K/s» Wooctwerld < Fanai^'Bre SBfeg ) near O.G.M. eiiort:, Aflnied_eol©iy,Nal^ar c^owK, Balptir," ; Tahs &Dt;Raipur(G.G). " ~ ' Vs. 1. Manoaarlal, aged

;:

^'•^.

lo(

'c'1•-S • ^?CC--'

II.'EHB.BI®G0UBI

A?_ BI£ASPffi (XSBWS13GSSE)

WBIT FSsxsres sow yoS.&zse^

M Eiianar Jain, Props K/s» Wooctwerld< Fanai^'Bre SBfeg ) near O.G.M. eiiort:,Aflnied_eol©iy,Nal^ar c^owK," Balptir,"~';Tahs &Dt;Raipur(G.G).

Vs.

1. Manoaarlal, aged abou-fc^O years,son of late Hanakram AKuja.

2. Prakasalal Ahaja, aged abQUt 48 years,;son of lat^ Nanaferaa Aaaaa.11•^f^y^'"^^s^s:agWg'''K^•T^::- .:;;:.;,*;-Ji:lrti:-SW»»***K!; '^Sw^-'SS^'X^^S^:^L^.^S^:..i,'"-/-^;i\^!:• ^—^f:.• ";'::CQ^»fc,Bs^W^,,iEaa.& •Q'e^'^en&f^:^'tasa^-Q'S!-^^^ '.";'BotM• ..:/.'^/^' resl.aeKbs;.,~.:..•"•:"- .:r •/.:' of- iiouse.'.."jBt;'•;••' Ne.l<-?1, :SSJ.gBEF^:::i{e.':•• \'\ ••••; ^ ^•••\; raear ^••'.• &);^^^si^-s^'"s^y»»'TO?>!

;i!:»;

pl<'

XI-HO-22

3II^?I?iIRi-litl alBSiilaiiii* W^l

•sRgT^naiwPiE^ate?, [s"a»'s<

sf^f 'qa^

....^.s.^

2004-

Page 1 of 2

*ii*ini shNicn2004-tare^st''fest'^^R-AWfall'l Hlial ^3?i^?r ^*di^ ^ri^cr^;N;TO31I^t'24.12.20041;.',•. -;Onamentionl ingmade,the^dse istaken up for hearing.Smt. Anju AHu^ja^counsel forI'hepetitjoner.Bythis writ petitionunderArfricle227 of the Constitution of India,the petitioner hcisquestionedthefe^dlity, propriety and corpectness of theorder dated 4th August, 2004(Anne(<ure^>(Anne(<ure^-5),passed bythe 4ti'Additiondt&istrict 3ud9e, Rdipur;iwherebytl'ie|leai-ried tridl CburtafterdeTerminingthearrenrsofreritundisir5e<^i-ion13(6)offhe [ Chhotti^arhAccommoddtion Control Act, dlrecTe|dthe petitloner herein to deposlt therent from the month of February,|2004,[a»][ the][ rate][ of][ Rs.6/300/-]permonth in theCourt.Brief facts leading to fitin9ctf this wTit petition as bome out fromtherecord, are that ttie^petitionepj[herein took the disputed premises onrent fromone Late Nanakram Ahuja,and'during the tenancy Late NanakramAhuja explred leavlng behlnd the i^pe|spon(lenTs hepein and one Suntl Atiuja,hissons.As the petitioner failedt*pay the rent,the pespondieiri^ gave anotice To hlm to/pay the rent offhe djsputed premises.(-towever, thepetrtioner failed •h> pay the pent, asjxresult ofwhichthe reqiondentSifileda suit under the Chhatti^arhAccdriimodation Controt Act for evictlon afldarrearsofrent.Thelier'leJnfttedaWritterifFhatietnientwiththe petitioneraverments that he has paid renf tc|Sunil Ahujq, oneoft'he-sons of.t.ate;Nanakram ^huja and the brothef<^f the ptamtiffs, larter' on he has atsopurchasedthe disputedpremisesfr4(m[Sunil][ Ahuja][ and][ he][ is][ not][ the][ fenan't']

.A\ .^"

\.s^

.l.;!

XI-HIS-22

^-^lilft^WS^MW^

''•'•\.i:';

I'MBI

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead