WPS/7071/2008 of VIJAY SHANKAR YADAV Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and OTHERS on 19 December 2008

-HC-22

1!^i^..—T-^-yjt^TI-HC-22:^T-I-TP-?'?'

an^r^TW\*[sn^r]sft*iich flf?a

'S^ ^Wv\^, yal'M'is, fqcii^y

an^?r inra?

"^200

•(rortl sbtlKh

|c|'b<8T'

ct)i*iF<vt-4lrl +ii+i<ni* ^ Tsl<l ^ $i<^sif^msn^r Grievaace of fhe petitioner|is that. he has been appointed asDriver ia fhe Central Jail,Bilas[pur agaiast fhe Ofher BackwardClasses quota.He has been ask:^d to produce his caste cerdficate,duly verified by fhe High Power (paste[Scrutiny][ Coniinittee](ia[short]"fhe Committee') aad accordingly,he subinltted his caste certi&cate^!.ts.befoi^ the Coiiunittee for verificatio|n. However, fhe Committee has notyet given[its][ fiiidings][ on][ verificati]ion of fhe caste certificate.In fhenieauwlule, the petitioner. has joiai^d his duties, faowever, he has beendiFected by the Superintendent; Cc(ntral ijail, Bilaspur to produce dulyverified. caste certificate by 25.9.2(POS and in these circuiiistaiices, heapprehends fhat he inay be reinovefd froiu services for uone ofhis fault.Leariied couiisel for the petit|ioner submits fhat ttus petition maybe disposed ofwifh a direction to|±ierespondeut No.4/fhe Cominitteeto give its decision on verification|of caste certificate of the petitionerwifhia a specified ttme and tBl tt\e same is decided, the respondentNo.3 be further directed not to t^ke any coercive steps against thepetitioner for not produciag his ca^Ite certificate.Mr. Y.S. Thakur, leamed Dy,Advocate General appeanng for theState si-tbinits fhat ia case'thepe|titipner presents himself before theCoininittee along wifh copy of fhis|order withia a week, the CommitteeshaU give its decision regardtng v^rification of his caste certi&cate inaccordance wifh law, withia afutftier period of two weeks from. fhedate the petitioner presents himseljlu view of aforesaid subinlIssions[[of]]leamed[[counsel]]£>r[[the]]parties, the instant petition is d|^sposed of with a direction to the.

Issions[[of]]leamed[[counsel]]£>r[[the]] is d|^sposed of with a direction to the. d|^sposed of with a direction to the.^sposed of with a direction to the. of with a direction to the. with a direction to the. a direction to the. direction to the. to the. the.

+-

[-HC-22'S^I's??<syJJ •^nwti, anl'M'iio, hfiwyKsAS?E''aiT^OT 'cRra?*<1*«11 g,^jq,——————————••-—-^F^200'ft^w'SII^T^TR-li*[311^1]•dtl^l '^iraR; ^)f?tTcfti<)i<n41i'^3llWT-3II^T *ii^iT'^f^^<r^t$i<5b^i(=t> •af^Tpetitioner to appear before the C<\Immittee on 23rd December, 2008along wifh copy of fhis order. The[Coiuiuittee shall, fhereafter, decidesocialstatus ofthe petitioner witTnr|a further period oftwo weeks froiathat date ia accordaace wifh law. IIifhe nieaawhile, respondents No. 2& 3 shall not take auy coercive s1;ps against fhe petitioner for non-production of duly yerified caste c|csrtificate, if the petitioner has notalready been reinoved.Certified copy as per rules.(eh/f^fg^