Gujarat High Court

SCR.A/1220/1991 of HALIMABEN ABDULKARIM PARMAR Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 7 February 1997

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 1220 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 1220 of 1991

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT

============================================================

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

Nos.1 to 5 - No.

-------------------------------------------------------------- HALIMABEN ABDULKARIM PARMAR

Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

MR JP GADHAVI for Petitioner MR.ST MEHTA,ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent No. 2

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT Date of decision: 07/02/97

ORAL JUDGEMENT

The petitioner herein has made a grievance that her application for maintenance under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure being Cri.Misc.Application No.399/81 preferred before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Rajkot, has not been decided by the said Court. She has, therefore, claimed interim maintenance pending the hearing and disposal of the Criminal Misc.Application No.399/81.

Pursuant to the directions issued by this court the learned Judicial Magistrate, First-Class, Rajkot, has submitted his report and sent a copy of the judgment and order passed in Cri.Misc.Application No.399/81. It appears that the Cri.Misc.Application No.399/81 has been allowed by the learned Magistrate under his judgment and order dated 13th August 1991. In view of the said judgment this petition does not survive.

Petition is, therefore, dismissed. Rule is discharged.

********

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead