Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/42318/2022 of CHIKATLA SATYANARAYANA/SATTIBABU Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 30 December 2022
SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY W.P.No. 42318 of 2022 ORDER:- Questioning the action of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s structure situated in Door No.3-136 in an extent of Ac.0.02 ½ cents of Kotipalli Village,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY W.P.No. 42318 of 2022
ORDER:-
Questioning the action of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s structure situated in Door No.3-136 in an extent of Ac.0.02 ½ cents of Kotipalli Village, K.Gangavaram Mandal, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Konaseema District, without following due process of law, the present writ petition is filed.
The case of the petitioner is that he is the absolute owner and possessors of the above mentioned structure/building; that on 24-12-2022 the 3[rd] respondent, without recourse to law and without issuing any notice and at the behest of the local people, came and tried to dispossess him from the subject property; that the 3[rd] respondent has no authority or power to dispossess him without following due process of law, is the only grievance in this writ petition.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Pleader states that if at all the building/structure of the petitioner is required for any public purpose, they will follow due process of law before initiating any action.
Accordingly, without going into the merits or demerits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of, at the stage of admission, directing the respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property without following the due process of law. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed in consequence.
30-12-2022. TSNR
________________
K.SURESH REDDY,J