Chhattisgarh High Court
CRA/1010/2003 of Mallu alias Suraj Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 16 December 2003
HISH Com? 9F JWIGATERE AT BEASPW (6.5.) anna Appeal noJOZO /zoc3. wk/’ RPW’ACCESW V Malia alias suraj§ aged 27 (In juéieial mastody) YO“? Ram Kama: ;s/arua1, resident pfpchimgg ma . 9.3.sarkanéa.' Bilaspur'y Tab. c: Matt. nuaspnr (med WM versuao state of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN mE‘ HISH Com?9F JWIGATERE AT BEASPW(6.5.)wanna Appeal noJOZO/zoc3.wk/’VRPW’ACCESWMalia alias suraj§ aged27(In juéieialmastody)YO“?Ram Kama:;s/arua1,WMresident pf pchimgg ma .9.3.sarkanéa.'Bilaspur'y Tab.c: Matt. nuaspnr (medversuaostateof ChhattisgsrhTglr.“ghvsooosarkaada,TahJc Distt’Jilaspur(c.¢.)(1mm a? Appm mm sm'rxou374GE THE cans a?(z)autumn. mocmmx.1973)
XI-HC—78
.CrMOloInz
m[200]
WW
eném W (Wu)
3%?[“WW]WE, Wmg
Qxf—WNMDIDIN
mm[12W](Kai‘wég)
w
“cmfsm’s‘a’ma‘ff
r
‘W
rm-“
aSuraJhas filed This appeal alone againsf fhe said judgmen‘rAH The+hreeaccusedmciudmgfheprese1'appellan‘rnamelyMahan‘l'ahasMahendmDuwakar- alias Guddu andalias SuraJ have filed Criminalg«\allu3Appeal No.1108 of 2003 andi’r is perlding before['l'his]Court:In The Circumsfanceswe areof The opinion‘iha‘r This appealisys/iunnecessarysince fhe appellan‘ri‘rhis appealis also an appellan'rinl'lhisl[Criminal]AppealNo.1108of2003,appealstands disposedofaslunnecessary.i l ShriM.D.Sharmacounselfr- Theappellanfis+0permi‘Hedappear for appellanf No.3[-]Mallu alis SuraJ in Criminal Appeal No 1108of 2003.
l
In View of This order
I A
No
698 of 2003 sfands disposed of
l
Sdl-
Sd/
l
L c BHADocI
'
Judge
M
7/
l
x
l
i
“W