Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/42/2000 of GRAM PANCHAYAT Vs GOVT.OF C.G. on 15 December 2000
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) 5f3>wan“ pmmmm No.\)\’/,0F 2000 BETWEEN Gram Panchayat,‘ Sikosh,‘ through its Sarpanch,8mt. Puspa Bai Patel a’ged 35_years, W/o Shri Vishhu ?rasad Patel,‘ Sarpanch , Gram Panchayat Sikosh, Block ~ Development
1NTHEHIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREATBILASPUR
(CHHATTISGARH)
5f3>
wan“ pmmmm No.\)\’/,0F
2000
BETWEEN
Gram Panchayat,‘Sikosh,‘throughitsSarpanch,8mt.PuspaBai Patela’ged35_years,W/o Shri Vishhu ?rasad~Patel,‘Sarpanch,Gram Panchayat Sikosh,BlockDevelopmentGunder Debi;District Durg(Chhattisgarh).‘
EETI§£QNER
*r"
4k[N12]
'its
.,Through
Gavernment ofbAL‘c’QQwggixy’APrincipal$ecpetary;["]@P‘w/j '
District Durg
Bufg,
A
TheCollector;
‘é‘rakash;SShriVed,TheSub DivisionalQEficerDigtrict Durg(Chhattisgarh)[.]
H
(Revenue)Pa1:an,
RevenueInspector;Gunderaehi
$hriYashwfant Kumar[Sahu;]Gunderdehiid[R—l][ Division;](Chhattisgarh)[I.]
Page 1 of 2
Rakeshv[sharma]son oflateshri[Chahdrikafrasad]Shama,Regident[of][ Village]SikoshiTahsilGunderdehi;District[burg](ChhattiSgarh)[.]
‘resident
$hiv Prasaé.[Fade,]5:3/0Bhri$byamlal;‘Eahsiloi: Villagesikosh,Gunderdehi,DistrictDurg(Chhattisgarh)[.]
Madhya Pradesh$tateMiniigf Corporation[Limited,]'.Branch Durg,DistricttDurg(Chhattisgarh)
RESPONDENT[$]
“@1133“ PLEgggIoN Ugggg~mwgggE$ 23p AmggNSTmUTIoN[OF][ mgg]
THE
E
UNMGQ gay“
3am uwJEw
'mm,wué$nmgg
/[//]
aw m, Wm, wag?
W m
-w p No.42/2ooo
3mm (W)
SgST TET, WM,a : -_ -.77:. :{ - 7 .Oo“.W.P.No, 42/2000|_.|.=|- -; _ a: oxarate |ge|) aerateooPo Certifiedcopy to tHe parties within 3 days.>eMPRaof fpRS.GargLN
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…