Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/66/2000 of MANBAHAL SINGH Vs STATE and ORS. on 13 December 2000
COURT OF JUD‘ (CHEATTISGARH) ICAL‘URE AT :__B’I"Iasp‘t:ia mm pETxTION N0. {C OF 1%2CNQé9 . BETMEEN Manbahal Singh aged about 4O years, S/o Ram 8ingh .bycaste Rajput, tesident ‘ of village Chhindmuda,P.0 Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa (WP).
‘IN‘THEHIGHCOURTOFJUDICAL‘UREAT:__B’I"Iasp‘t:ia(CHEATTISGARH)mm pETxTIONN0. {COF 1%2CNQé9.BETMEEN
ManbahalSinghagedabout4Oyears,S/oRam8ingh .bycaste Rajput,tesident[‘of]villageChhindmuda,P.0‘DeoryTahsilSakti,DistrictJanjgirChampa(WP).
.*7PETI‘I‘IODER
AND
1. ThroughTheStatetheofCollectorMadhya Pradesh,(mowJanjgjxChampa, (3mm;tisarhstate)DistrictJanjgir—Champar/‘.‘
TheDivis ionalForestOfficer,Forest Department Korba,"DistricteKorbar
3. TheRanger,Forest DepartmentkSakti,Tahsil aakti,DistrictJanjigir-Champa‘
6
RE SP OWE NTS
wRIT PETITION UNDERA ARTICLM’QF[INDIA]
’226/227OFTHECONSTITUTION
Chhattis‘gax-h,BilaspurW W, WW
‘.‘wLp.No.55/2006‘nqFH aamER"mmmmm“mm,fIF:200.
'mvm' (W)
mm‘§wmWme;*mm13/12/2000ShriP.Mishra,lear 1ed hounsel forthepetitioner.iShri RanveerSingh,‘ +e\arned1ccunselfor3>’ .respondents}‘iState.HeardoTakingintocbnsiderahtiontthereliefsqlaimed[by]the‘petitionérandtheaiPegations madeinthepetition,Idonotconsiderpresen:to bea.fitcaseforir'xvokingw225ofthe Constitutionof'jurisdiction[uhaer][ Artich]India._Ifthepetitionerfeelsthattheamount ofpom-pensation[alreaoy]paidtohimis ¢nhanceb245[then]heshallbefreetoilodgehisclaim[before]a CivilCourto‘.Thepetitionisdismissed._\7f—Sd/'R.S.[Garg]Judger Snr
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…