Chhattisgarh High Court
CONT/190/2010 of S.D.SAHU Vs NARANYAN SINGH and OTHERS on 16 December 2010
g B PSfY ff ^ d> HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR PETITIONER CONTEMPT CASE (C l No. 190 of 2010 S.D. Sahu, S/o Late Shri R.D. Sahu, aged about 49 years, R/o Qtr. No. E-2, Polytechnic Campus, Ambikapur, Surguja, permanent resident of Plot No. 16, Hanuman Nagar, Durg, District Durg (C.G.)
Att ^^sBgPSfY ffd>^
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CONTEMPT CASE (C l No. 190 of 2010
PETITIONER
S.D.Sahu,S/oLateShriR.D.Sahu, aged about 49 years, R/oQtr. No. E-2, Polytechnic Campus,Ambikapur,Surguja,permanentresident of Plot No. 16, HanumanNagar, Durg, District Durg (C.G.)
Versus1NaranyanSingh,Secretary,TechnicalEducation,D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur,District Raipur(C.G.)TechnicalEducation,D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur,District Raipur(C.G.)
RESPONDENTSContemnors
2DhananjayDewangan,ExIn-chargeCollector,Ambikapur,DistrictSurguja(C.G.)chargeCollector,Ambikapur,DistrictSurguja(C.G.)
3KamalPreetSingh,PresentCollector,Ambikapur,DistrictSurguja (C.G.)Collector,Ambikapur,DistrictSurguja (C.G.)
4R.J.Pandey,ActingPrincipalPolytechnic College, Ambikapur,District Surguja (C.G.)Polytechnic College, Ambikapur,District Surguja (C.G.)
CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTIONREAD WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT
Appearance:
Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.2.
Mr.. Pawan Shrivastava, Advocate for respondent No.4.
ORAL ORDER
(16.12.2010)
SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J.
Heard.
Page 1 of 2
At the very outset, Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur makes statementthat the petitioner has been offered to join at Polytechnic, Ambikapurignoring the order dated 22.7.2010 passed by the Collector, Sarguja(CG).
On such statement made by learned counsel for respondentNo.2, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this ^"^
....""^^S fl^:I%»i''!£&^:y^ 1^-
\»v
Contempt Case <C) No. 190 of 2010
contempt petition with liberty to file subsequent petition, if such anexigency arises in future.
Permission granted.Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of, as withdrawnwith the aforesaid liberty granted in favour ofthe petitioner.
^^rsinba
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…