Chhattisgarh High Court
CRMP/878/2010 of SMT. URMILA @ MUNNI AGRAHARI Vs DEEPAK AGRHARI and ORS. on 16 December 2010
CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. Cr.M.P.No.878 of 2010 Appellant Smt. Urmila @ Munni Agrhari, aged about 28 years, w/o. Deepak Agrhari, r/o. c/o. Shri Lalu Prasad Gupta, Durpa Road Korba, Tahsil and District
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
DIVISION BENCH
CORAM:HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. &HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J.
Cr.M.P.No.878 of 2010
Appellant
Smt. Urmila @ Munni Agrhari, agedabout28years,w/o.DeepakAgrhari, r/o. c/o. Shri Lalu PrasadGupta, Durpa Road Korba, Tahsiland District Korba (CG).
VERSUS
Respondents
1.DeepakAgrhari,s/o.Rambadanaged about 30 years.aged about 30 years.
2Rambadans/ol.NathuniPrasad,aged about 57 years.aged about 57 years.3Smt. Chandrakanti w/o. RambadanGupta, agedabout 45 years.Gupta, agedabout 45 years.
4Roshan @ Chhotu s/o. Rambadan,aged about 25 years.aged about 25 years.
5PrakashGupta,s/o.Rambadan,aged about 27 years.Allr/o.village near PaaniTanki,Bankimongra, Korba, DistrictKorbaaged about 27 years.Allr/o.village near PaaniTanki,Bankimongra, Korba, DistrictKorba (Accused persons).
6.State of Chhattisgarh, through theDistrict Magistrate, Korba (CG).District Magistrate, Korba (CG).
Acauittal Appeal u/S 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Present:Shri Rajnish Shrivastava, counsel for the petitionerShri Akhil Mishra, Deputy Govemment Advocate forthe State /respondent No.6.
'%.8
^"^'^.1&'^^i.,/^ss^
subbu
ORDER
•th
Page 1 of 2
•th(16m December, 2010)
ThefollowingorderoftheCouri:waspassedbyRajeev Gupta, C.J.
ShriRajnishShrivastava,learnedcounsetforthein view of the order today inpetitioner/complainant, passedCr.M.P.No.890/2010 whereby leave to appeat against the acquittalof respondents accused persons No.1Deepak Agrhari,No.2Rambadan,No.3Smt Chandrakanti,No.4Roshan @ Chhotuand No.5Prakash Gupta was granted and the acquittal appealwas admitted for hearing, seeks permission to withdraw the petitionfited by the petitioner/complainant for grant of special leave toappeal with the liberty of assisting the State eounselin the saidacquittat appeal.
2) Permission granted. granted.
3) Wtththeaboveliberty,theisdismissedaspetitionwithdrawn.
Sd/-R.N. ChandrakarJudge
Sd/-
ChiefJustice
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…