Chhattisgarh High Court
MCRC/7818/2017 of Lokesh @ Golu @ Lokeshwar Thakur Vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 19 December 2017
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 7818 of 2017 1. Lokesh @ Golu @ Lokeshwar Thakur S/o Late Bal Singh Thakur, Aged About 26 Years Caste Dhaked, R/o Chind Gaon P. S. Badanji Tahsil Lohandiguda, District Bastar Chhattisgarh, Present Add. House Of Ramlal Meshram Bade Dharaur Police Station
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 7818 of 2017
1. Lokesh @ Golu @ Lokeshwar Thakur S/o Late Bal Singh Thakur, AgedAbout 26 Years Caste Dhaked, R/o Chind Gaon P. S. Badanji TahsilLohandiguda, District Bastar Chhattisgarh, Present Add. House OfRamlal Meshram Bade Dharaur Police Station Lohandiguda DistrictBastar Chhattisgarh About 26 Years Caste Dhaked, R/o Chind Gaon P. S. Badanji TahsilLohandiguda, District Bastar Chhattisgarh, Present Add. House OfRamlal Meshram Bade Dharaur Police Station Lohandiguda DistrictBastar Chhattisgarh
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Lohandiguda DistrictBastar Chhattisgarh State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Lohandiguda DistrictBastar Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
For ApplicantFor Respondent/State
Shri Vikash A. Shrivastava, AdvocateShri Ravindra Agrawal, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel 19/12/2017
Order On Board
1. Heard.
2. The applicant has preferred this application filed under Section 439 ofthe Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail as he is arrested in connection withcrime No.49/2017 registered in Police Station Lohandiguda DistrictBastar, for offence punishable under Section 456 & 354 of the IndianPenal Code and Section 8 of the Protection of Children from SexualOffences Act, 2012. the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail as he is arrested in connection withcrime No.49/2017 registered in Police Station Lohandiguda DistrictBastar, for offence punishable under Section 456 & 354 of the IndianPenal Code and Section 8 of the Protection of Children from SexualOffences Act, 2012.
Page 1 of 2
3. It is argued that the applicant is an innocent person. He is in detentionsince 2-8-2017. There is an allegation that to outrage the modesty ofsince 2-8-2017. There is an allegation that to outrage the modesty of the daughter of the complainant the applicant entered into his house inthe midnight of the fateful day.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the State would oppose the bailapplication.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; and also the factthat the applicant is in detention since 2-8-2017, this Court is inclined torelease the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed andthe applicant is directed to be released on bail on executing a personalbond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety for the like amount to thesatisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trialCourt on each and every date given by the said Court.
Sd/-
Gowri
Arvind Singh ChandelWinter Holiday Judge
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…