Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/2112/2003 of K.P.DUBEY Vs M/S.LIFE INSURANCE CORP.and ORS. on 5 December 2003
HIGH CQURT OF JUDICATURE AT BnASiPUR INTHEMATTEROF K.P. 'CTJBEY, AGED 55 YEARS, S/OSHRIG.P.DUBEY R/0 MAIHAR CEMENT SARLA NAGAR, DIST- SATNA /' W.P. N0. /20Q3 / / ..PETITIONER VERSUS l.M/SUFE INSURANCE OORPORA.TION, TP^OUGHTPffi EIVISIONAL MANAGER^ LI.C. BUILE3NG, PANE3RI, RAIPUR,(Ca) / /'
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
/^\^~BEFORE THE HQN'BLE HIGH CQURT OF JUDICATURE ATBnASiPUR/'/INTHEMATTEROFW.P. N0./20Q3 /K.P.['CTJBEY,]AGED 55 YEARS,S/OSHRIG.P.DUBEYR/0 MAIHAR CEMENT SARLANAGAR,DIST- SATNA..PETITIONERVERSUS/',-•••l.M/SUFE INSURANCE OORPORA.TION,*LVT^-****^-••<-...-"F.TP^OUGHTPffi EIVISIONAL MANAGER^'./'^^s^LI.C. BUILE3NG, PANE3RI,^•^es^"RAIPUR,(Ca)/f:^!<^""^^'2 M/sAMBCJJACBMENT,THROUGHTHE MANAGING DIRBCTTOR.RAWAH DISTRICT RAIPUR.RESPQNDENTS.^ss"WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22^227 OTTHE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA FOR I&SUANCE OF WRtTti< THE NATURE OFMANDAMUS AND ANY OTHER ORDER ORDIRECTIQNASDEEMEDFIT
;i HC-22"3^ -<fnw<f, i?Til+i'i<», IsKtiyy3n^?r xra^?Jf^£i^^...2/ / ^/°^111CTI shlichfe^ET'•sn^'R;';iro ^ichl^<T1<ftl *1HCllf "^ FS^ if^^K an^l31)^1-FOIW ^lfel^ sifigt aii^i8:'':)N? Tliftg05/12/2003Applicant by Shrl /^-,^i'yhv-^. ^. fitvToday the case islisted for orders on defaullDefault, if not made good,be good within 15 clayssubj^et^•TT^Sto cost of Rs.50/- payableto the High Court BarAssoclLationtaillng wh-tch the petitionihallautomat.i.cally stand dismissjiflwithout reference to the Betbch..AJudyea.iU-..'w["^% ^s^m XV-OR'
^
L^) • P. |0o.
In comtrftance cS Hon'bte Courfs Ordcr (teted 05.12.2003, thepetitfoner was required to deposit cost of Rs^)/- payabte to theHigh Court Bar Associatfon and to remove the defauft within 15 daysfrom 05.12.2003, failing which the peUtaonshall stand dfemfesedautomatically without reference to the Bench.
From the note of filing cterk dated 27.02.2004, note <rf DAdated 14.06.2004 and the note of D.R-(J) dated 15.06.2004, it feapparent that the petitioner has partly comptied with the dfreGyongwen by the Hon'bte Court. Though he has paid the P.F. atengwfthJTierefore,condonataon the of petitfon delay applica<feniji§did should -bc''dismissednot pay in any view costof of the Rs.50/-. pre-emptive order passed by the Hon'bte Court.Coureel may bein^srmed accordingly.
Sd/-A.R.(J)
l8A)6.2004
DA (W.P.)
y'al:/-!y^
^
/^:^.^-^.rt\'